The Arrogance of Zionists in Planning a ‘New Middle East’
Muhammad Salahuddin, Arab News
August 10, 2006
Some features and characteristics of the “new Middle East” which US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice promised — what she earlier called “the creative mess” — are gradually appearing and becoming clearly visible. For many years, the plan has been unclear and known only through rumors being spread here and there by the American Zionist government, intelligence bodies or certain research centers.
In spite of the massive destruction, the massacres and the genocide happening where the American war is using the most violent weapons in its arsenal, including those that are internationally forbidden, Lebanon is considered the first practical model of the “new Middle East.” It is something that Rice chose to draw our attention to as a lesson and as something to be taken on board lest we consider opposing or resisting.
The opening night of the second practical model was held in Britain a few days ago. A British report revealed the plans for settling 50,000 Palestinian refugees in Egypt’s western desert and the Sudan.
It was a plan that called for settling Palestinian refugees in a number of Arab countries. The British newspaper, The Guardian, noted that the CIA was in charge of carrying out the project and that it would soon present a tender for bids to construct model villages in Egypt and Sudan to house a number of residents.
The buildings themselves will be located in a special area of fertile land with good quality water and a very small population. The Guardian also stated that the CIA named the project “Village 2010” with 2010 referring to the year of completing the project and noting that American President Bush had suggested the name.
The American Zionist interest in Sudan — in other words the keeping the Sudanese population away from the area for years and the international forces to be sent to Darfur are not there to save innocent children and women victims and not to prevent the genocide happening there.
It’s all being carried out by the Israeli forces in Lebanon for the benefit of the United States of America. So what has been planned for Sudan is to get rid of a part of the five million Palestinian refugees who disturb the American president, his secretary of state and of course, Israel. The region in Sudan is rich in resources and most importantly, oil and uranium.
Iraq is undoubtedly another example of the “new Middle East.” The American war brought the country bloody massacres, destructive rebellions and resentful racism that are destroying the country’s unity. Yet, it is obvious and assured that the Zionists in Washington planned for all the Arab countries in the “new Middle East” what is sadly similar to what’s happening in Iraq and Lebanon. The theory is turning into reality and it is more than just another frightening nightmare.
Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal was asked last week whether he approved of the term “the New Middle East.” And I wish that he had drifted a little bit away from his usual good manners and sophisticated diplomacy in expressing his opinion.
I truly believe that the arrogant Condoleezza Rice has reached an unaccepted and illogical level of humiliation, addressing the “new Middle East” as if Arabs were herd of sheep and she the butcher who decides their fate.
Prince Saud said, “We want to go back to our old Middle East. We can only see more problems and catastrophes in the new one. The Middle East is not a territory without human beings and therefore, our fates must be decided by our nations. If people deserve to live, then they will become united and create a situation that will save our interests. I do believe that our fate is in our hands and not someone else’s; no matter how strong the confronting forces are, there are always capabilities and powers to help us protect ourselves.”
His response was both polite and profound and it only makes sense and can be carried out by people who are civilized, have humanitarian goals and respect for others.
The Zionist mind, however, is incapable of comprehending any of these nor does it understands the subtlety of complex diplomatic signals.
August 10, 2006
Some features and characteristics of the “new Middle East” which US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice promised — what she earlier called “the creative mess” — are gradually appearing and becoming clearly visible. For many years, the plan has been unclear and known only through rumors being spread here and there by the American Zionist government, intelligence bodies or certain research centers.
In spite of the massive destruction, the massacres and the genocide happening where the American war is using the most violent weapons in its arsenal, including those that are internationally forbidden, Lebanon is considered the first practical model of the “new Middle East.” It is something that Rice chose to draw our attention to as a lesson and as something to be taken on board lest we consider opposing or resisting.
The opening night of the second practical model was held in Britain a few days ago. A British report revealed the plans for settling 50,000 Palestinian refugees in Egypt’s western desert and the Sudan.
It was a plan that called for settling Palestinian refugees in a number of Arab countries. The British newspaper, The Guardian, noted that the CIA was in charge of carrying out the project and that it would soon present a tender for bids to construct model villages in Egypt and Sudan to house a number of residents.
The buildings themselves will be located in a special area of fertile land with good quality water and a very small population. The Guardian also stated that the CIA named the project “Village 2010” with 2010 referring to the year of completing the project and noting that American President Bush had suggested the name.
The American Zionist interest in Sudan — in other words the keeping the Sudanese population away from the area for years and the international forces to be sent to Darfur are not there to save innocent children and women victims and not to prevent the genocide happening there.
It’s all being carried out by the Israeli forces in Lebanon for the benefit of the United States of America. So what has been planned for Sudan is to get rid of a part of the five million Palestinian refugees who disturb the American president, his secretary of state and of course, Israel. The region in Sudan is rich in resources and most importantly, oil and uranium.
Iraq is undoubtedly another example of the “new Middle East.” The American war brought the country bloody massacres, destructive rebellions and resentful racism that are destroying the country’s unity. Yet, it is obvious and assured that the Zionists in Washington planned for all the Arab countries in the “new Middle East” what is sadly similar to what’s happening in Iraq and Lebanon. The theory is turning into reality and it is more than just another frightening nightmare.
Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal was asked last week whether he approved of the term “the New Middle East.” And I wish that he had drifted a little bit away from his usual good manners and sophisticated diplomacy in expressing his opinion.
I truly believe that the arrogant Condoleezza Rice has reached an unaccepted and illogical level of humiliation, addressing the “new Middle East” as if Arabs were herd of sheep and she the butcher who decides their fate.
Prince Saud said, “We want to go back to our old Middle East. We can only see more problems and catastrophes in the new one. The Middle East is not a territory without human beings and therefore, our fates must be decided by our nations. If people deserve to live, then they will become united and create a situation that will save our interests. I do believe that our fate is in our hands and not someone else’s; no matter how strong the confronting forces are, there are always capabilities and powers to help us protect ourselves.”
His response was both polite and profound and it only makes sense and can be carried out by people who are civilized, have humanitarian goals and respect for others.
The Zionist mind, however, is incapable of comprehending any of these nor does it understands the subtlety of complex diplomatic signals.
posted by HRM Deborah of Israel and the Messenger of Peace at 6:35 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home