Monday, February 5, 2007

Syria: Talks with U.S. Iraq's only hope

Some hundreds Iraqi refugees in Syria stage a protest before the offices of the U.N. High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) Monday Feb. 5, 2007, to protest against what they say are new visa regulations against displaced Iraqi people. A Syrian government official dismissed Sunday Iraqi accusations that it was taking measures against Iraqi refugees. Protesters carried photos of Syrian President Assad, Iraqi flags and banners declaring their opposition to the visa regulations. (AP Photo / Bassem Tellawi)
February 5, 2007
DAMASCUS, Syria -President Bashar Assad said cooperation — and negotiations — between Syria and the United States could be the "last chance" to avoid full-scale civil war in Iraq.

Assad criticized President Bush, saying his administration does not have the "vision" to bring peace in Iraq. In the interview with Diane Sawyer on ABC News' "Good Morning America," Assad praised Bush's father, saying the elder Bush had the "will to achieve the peace in the region."

Assad said Syria could help negotiate among Iraq's factions.

"We're not the only player, not the single player. But we are the main player in this issue," Assad said. "So that's how we can stop the violence."

The bipartisan Iraq Study Group recommended in December that the Bush administration make diplomatic overtures to Syria and Iran to use their influence with Sunni and Shiite extremist groups to curb the violence and prevent the conflict from spilling over into the rest of the Middle East.

But the White House rejected the recommendation, instead deciding to send another 21,500 U.S. troops mostly to Baghdad for a major security crackdown — the third in a year.
Assad said the Syrians were not optimistic that the Bush administration would pursue diplomatic contacts despite pressure from Congress to do so.

"I think it's too late for them to move toward that. It doesn't mean we can't turn the tide. But (it may be) too late because Iraqis are heading towards civil war. So maybe (this is) the last chance that we have now to start."

Assad insisted that Syria had good relations with all the Iraqi parties.

In recent weeks, however, Iraq's Shiite-led government has become increasingly critical of Syria for allegedly harboring fugitives who finance and support the Sunni insurgency. The government has also accused Syria of turning back Iraqis trying to flee the country and threatening to deport those already living there.

The strident attacks are similar to those leveled by the United States against Iran for allegedly supplying Shiite militias with training, weapons and money. The Iraqi government has so far refrained from criticizing Shiite-led Iran.

Assad insisted that Syria, Iran and other regional powers have a stake in bringing peace to Iraq.

"So if we have this chaos in Iraq, it will spill over to Syria and to other countries. So saying this, like saying that the Syrian government is working against the Syrian interest, this is impossible," he said.

During the interview, Assad also criticized Washington for trying to solve the Iraqi crisis through more troops.

He said the Americans shared the blame for the chaos "because they're responsible for the political situation." That appeared to refer to a U.S. policy early in the occupation favoring the Shiite majority over Sunnis, who were dominant during the Saddam Hussein regime.

"They only talk about troops and power, not about the political process," Assad said.

4 Comments:

Blogger Karin said...

I didn't know it takes to be a rocket-scientist to understand that YES - Syria DOES have the ability to mediate and to significantly contribute to a stabilisation in the region! THERE IS NO MILITARY SOLUTION POSSIBLE ... what is so difficult to understand??

Thanks so much for highlighting that rapidly deteriorating situation ... a solution could be in sight but arrogance and personal interests seem to make it more and more hypothetical!

2:03 AM  
Blogger HRM Deborah of Israel and the Messenger of Peace said...

I love Munch,

I was wondering if part of the problem is because Syria and Israel, let's say are not getting along.

2:20 AM  
Blogger Karin said...

If at all, I think only a MINOR problem! The MAIN problem is most certainly that in case Israel would indeed engage in serious negotiations with Syria - the MAIN CONDITION Syria would set would be the return of the Golan ... and in order to show to the world Israel has serious intentions, she would have to accept - and comply.
BIGGEST problem in this case-scenario is that this idea - at present - does NOT GO WELL WITH THE ISRAELI PUBLIC and would cost the current government DEARLY ... and THAT'S why they don't even want to START the whole story!

I guess THAT'S the reason ... :-)

7:03 AM  
Blogger HRM Deborah of Israel and the Messenger of Peace said...

I love Munich,

That is part of the reason, but if you look closer, you will several parts to the whole situation.

7:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home