Saturday, October 28, 2006

Egypt boosts security along the border with Gaza

By Yusri Mohamed

ISMAILIA, Egypt, Oct 28 (Reuters) - Egypt beefed up security along its border with the Gaza Strip after an Israeli daily said Israel may bomb tunnels used for smuggling weapons into the Palestinian territories, security officials said on Saturday.

They said at least 750 members of the police's central security force joined a similar number of border guards already deployed along the area known as the Philadelphi Corridor, fearing the possible operation's impact on civilians living on the Egyptian side of the border.

The Israeli daily newspaper Maariv reported on Friday that precision-guided weapons would be used to penetrate deep underground in the hope of destroying the tunnel network that the Jewish state says riddles the area, which is 11 km long (6.5 miles) and approximately 100 metres wide.

The decision to use "smart" bombs may be a substitute to reoccupying the entire region, the newspaper said. Israel says it has been unable to control weapons smuggling into Gaza since it withdrew its forces from the coastal strip last year.

"We are following the situation with extreme concern and we have not received any warnings from the Israeli side about this operation," one Egyptian official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The Israeli army declined to comment on the report.

Israel started to target underground passages in the area after Palestinian militants tunnelled into Israel and captured one of its soldiers in a raid on June 25. The operation also sparked an expanded Israeli military offensive that killed more than 250 Palestinians, about half of them civilians.

Maariv reported that the air force was given the green light to drop bombs after a similar campaign successfully destroyed tunnels along the northern Gaza border with Israel.

Egyptian security and border officials said the possible Israeli operation could threaten around 20,000 civilians who live close to the border.

"There are schools, banks, markets and residential buildings close to the border with Gaza, which makes the use of such bombs more dangerous," one official said.

Several Egyptian civilians were killed and many wounded from cross-border bomb shrapnel during Israeli attacks on the Palestinian border town of Rafah before the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.

Egyptian police recently seized 195 crates of automatic weapons and ammunition meant to be smuggled across the border and the Israeli army said its troops discovered 15 tunnels along the border during the past week.

Israel estimates that tonnes of munitions, including advanced shoulder-fire missiles, have been smuggled into Gaza through the tunnels, though they have presented scarce evidence that Gaza militants use such weaponry.


Futher Information:

'Smart bombs' move to center stage in US arsenal

Smart Weapons (FAS)

What's New With Smart Weapons

Smart Bombs (CDI)

"Smart Bombs" Change Face of Modern War

How Smart Bombs Work


Photo courtesy U.S. Air Force
An F-16 drops a JDAM-equipped GBU-31 2,000-pound bomb.

This type of smart bomb was used to kill Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, on on June 7, 2006 while attending a meeting in an isolated safehouse approximately 8 km (5 mi) north of Baqubah. At 14:15 GMT two United States Air Force F-16C C jets identified the house and the lead jet dropped two 500-pound (230kg) guided bombs, a laser-guided GBU-12 and GPS-guided GBU-38 on the building located at 33°48'02.83″N, 44°30'48.58″E. Six others - three male and three female individuals - were also reported killed.

Palestinians differ over end to hostage crisis

An undated picture of abducted Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, 19, released by his family July 3, 2006. One of the three Palestinian factions holding Shalit in the Gaza Strip said on Saturday that it expected a solution to the crisis within days. REUTERS/Handout

October 28, 2006

By Nidal al-Mughrabi

GAZA (Reuters) - One of the three Palestinian factions holding an Israeli soldier in the Gaza Strip said on Saturday it expected a solution to the crisis within days, but Hamas and a Palestinian Authority official were less optimistic.

It was the first time since Corporal Gilad Shalit was captured in a cross-border raid in June that any of the factions has said that his release in exchange for Palestinian prisoners could happen soon.

The Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) said in a statement that the three groups had agreed to a proposal by Egyptian mediators, though it said a deal still depended on Israel. Israeli officials made no immediate comment.

"The dawn of freedom to the prisoners is about to rise and we expect a solution to our prisoners in few days," said a PRC spokesman, Abu Mujahed. "We confirm to you that there is a definite move in the issue of the captured soldier."


A Palestinian is shown posing with a picture of a jailed relative during a demonstration calling for the release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, in the West Bank city of Nablus, in this August 17, 2006 file photo. One of the three Palestinian factions holding a captured Israeli soldier in the Gaza Strip said on Saturday that it expected a solution to the crisis within days.

A political leader of the governing Hamas Islamist group, Osama al-Muzaini, was less optimistic, saying: "Real progress has been made over the issue of Shalit but that progress did not get to the point where we can say a swap was imminent."

The armed wing of Hamas was also among the groups that captured Shalit.

Palestinian Chief Negotiator Saeb Erekat said it was premature to think the crisis would soon be resolved.

"I don't think we're closer today to solving Shalit's problem than we were yesterday," Erekat told reporters in the West Bank city of Ramallah.

Hamas and its allies have demanded the release of up to 1,400 Palestinians, including minors and women, held by Israel in exchange for Shalit. Israel has said Hamas must first release Shalit and then it will consider any prisoner release.

The PRC on Saturday said the Egyptian proposal would include the release of Palestinians held by Israel. The group did not give any details.

Last week, Israel's infrastructure minister, Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, held talks in Cairo and afterwards expressed approval of a framework deal that Egypt had put forward, but he did not give details.

Shalit's capture prompted Israel to send troops back into the Gaza Strip almost one year after withdrawing from the territory it had captured in the 1967 war. More than 260 Palestinians, about half of them civilians, have been killed in the subsequent Israeli offensive.

(Additional reporting by Wafa Amr in Ramallah)

What Cleo's Thinking...

What Cleo's thinking is that everyone deserves to live in peace, and nobody's homeland should ever be occupied.

A Best Friend is...









A best friend is one that will always listen and be ready to take the pain as well as the good in life standing by your side always.

By Barbie

A U.S. Fortress Rises in Baghdad: Asian Workers Trafficked to Build World's Largest Embassy

cartoon by Khalil Bendib

by David Phinney, Special to CorpWatch
October 17th, 2006

John Owen didn’t realize how different his job would be from his last 27 years in construction until he signed on with First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting in November 2005. Working as general foreman, he would be overseeing an army of workers building the largest, most expensive and heavily fortified US embassy in the world. Scheduled to open in 2007, the sprawling complex near the Tigris River will equal Vatican City in size.

Then seven months into the job, he quit.

Not one of the five different US embassy sites he had worked on around the world compared to the mess he describes. Armenia, Bulgaria, Angola, Cameroon and Cambodia all had their share of dictators, violence and economic disruption, but the companies building the embassies were always fair and professional, he says. The Kuwait-based company building the $592-million Baghdad project is the exception. Brutal and inhumane, he says “I’ve never seen a project more fucked up. Every US labor law was broken.”

In the resignation letter last June, Owen told First Kuwaiti and US State Department officials that his managers beat their construction workers, demonstrated little regard for worker safety, and routinely breached security.

And it was all happening smack in the middle of the US-controlled Green Zone -- right under the nose of the State Department that had quietly awarded the controversial embassy contract in July 2005.

He also complained of poor sanitation, squalid living conditions and medical malpractice in the labor camps where several thousand low-paid migrant workers lived. Those workers, recruited on the global labor market from the Philippines, India, Pakistan and other poor south Asian countries, earned as little as $10 to $30 a day.

As with many US-funded contractors, First Kuwaiti prefers importing labor because it views Iraqi workers as a security headache not worth the trouble.

No Questions Asked

By March 2005, First Kuwaiti’s operation began looking even sketchier to Owen as he boarded a nondescript white jet on his way back to Baghdad following some R&R in Kuwait city. He remembers being surrounded by about 50 First Kuwaiti laborers freshly hired from the Philippines and India. Everyone was holding boarding passes to Dubai – not to Baghdad.

"I thought there was some sort of mix up and I was getting on the wrong plane,” says the 48-year-old Floridian who once worked as a fisherman with his father before moving into the construction business.

He buttonholed a First Kuwaiti manager standing near by and asked what was going on. The manager waved his hand, looked around the terminal and whispered to keep quiet.

“‘If anyone hears we are going to Baghdad, they won’t let us on the plane,’” Owen recalls the manager saying.

The secrecy struck Owen as a little odd, but he grabbed his luggage and moved on. Everyone filed out to the private jet and flew directly to Baghdad. “I figured that they had visas for Kuwait and not Iraq,” Owen offers.The deception had the appearance of smuggling workers into Iraq, but Owen didn’t know at the time that the Philippines, India, and other countries had banned or restricted their citizens from working in Iraq because of safety concerns and fading support for the war. After 2004, many passports were stamped “Not valid for Iraq.”

Nor did Owen know that both the US State Department and the Pentagon were quietly investigating contractors such as First Kuwaiti for labor trafficking and worker abuse. In fact, the international news media had accused First Kuwaiti repeatedly of coercing workers to take jobs in battle-torn Iraq once they had been lured with safer offers to Kuwait. The company has billed several billion dollars on US contracts since the war began in March 2003 and now has an estimated 7,500 laborers in the theater of war.

Despite numerous emails and phone calls about such allegations, neither First Kuwaiti general manager Wadih Al Absi nor his lawyer Angela Styles, the former top White House contract policy advisor, have responded. After a year of requests, State Department officials involved with the project also have ignored or rejected opportunities for comment.Your

Passports Please

That same March Owen returned to work in Baghdad, Rory Mayberry would witness similar events after he flew to Kuwait from his home in Myrtle Creek, Oregon.

The gravely voiced, easy-going Army veteran had previously worked in Iraq for Halliburton and the private security company, Danubia. Missing the action and the big paychecks US contractors draw Iraq, he snagged a $10,000 a month job with MSDS consulting Company.

MSDS is a two-person minority-owned consulting company that assists US State Department managers in Washington with procurement programming. Never before had the firm offered medical services or worked in Iraq, but First Kuwaiti hired MSDS on the recommendation of Jim Golden, the State Department contract official overseeing the embassy project. Within days, an agreement worth hundreds of thousands of dollars for medical care was signed.

Mayberry sensed things weren’t right when he boarded a First Kuwaiti flight on March 15 to Baghdad – a different flight from Owen’s.

At the airport in Kuwait City, Mayberry said, he saw a person behind a counter hand First Kuwaiti managers a passenger manifest, an envelope of money and a stack of boarding passes to Dubai. The managers then handed out the boarding passes to Mayberry and 50 or so new First Kuwaiti laborers, mostly Filipinos.

The 45-year-old Mayberry, a former emergency medical technician in the Army who worked as a funeral director in Oregon, responded to a help wanted ad placed by MSDS. The plan was that he would work as a medic attending to the construction crews on the work site in Baghdad.

"Everyone was told to tell customs and security that they were flying to Dubai," Mayberry explains. Once the group passed the guards, they went upstairs and waited by the McDonald's for First Kuwaiti staff to unlock a door -- Gate 26 -- that led to an unmarked, white 52-seat jet. It was "an antique piece of shit" Mayberry offers in a casual, blunt manner.

“All the workers had their passports taken away by First Kuwaiti,” Mayberry claims, and while he knew the plane was bound for Baghdad, he’s not so sure the others were aware of their destination. The Asian laborers began asking questions about why they were flying north and the jet wasn't flying east over the ocean, he says. "I think they thought they were going to work in Dubai."

One former First Kuwaiti supervisor acknowledges that the company holds passports of many workers in Iraq – a violation of US contracting.

“All of the passports are kept in the offices,” said one company insider who requested anonymity in fear of financial and personal retribution. As for distributing Dubai boarding passes for Baghdad flights, “It’s because of the travel bans,” he explained.

Mayberry believes that migrant workers from the Philippines, India and Nepal are especially vulnerable to employers like First Kuwaiti because their countries have little or no diplomatic presence in Iraq.

“If you don’t have your passport or an embassy to go to, what you do to get out of a bad situation?” he asks. “How can they go to the US State Department for help if First Kuwaiti is building their embassy?”

Deadly ‘Candy Store’ Medicine

Owen had already been working at the embassy site since late November when Mayberry arrived. The two never crossed paths, but both share similar complaints about management of the project and brutal treatment of the laborers that, at times, numbered as many as 2,500. Most are from the Philippines, India, and Pakistan. Others are from Egypt and Turkey.

The number of workers with injuries and ailments stunned Mayberry. He went to work immediately after and stayed busy around the clock for days.

Four days later, First Kuwaiti pulled him off the job after he requested an investigation of two patients who had died before he arrived from what he suspected was medical malpractice. Mayberry also recommended that the health clinics be shut down because of unsanitary conditions and mismanagement.

“There hadn’t been any follow up on medical care. People were walking around intoxicated on pain relievers with unwrapped wounds and there were a lot of infections,” he recalls. “The idea that there was any hygiene seemed ridiculous. I’m not sure they were even bathing.”

In reports made available to the US State Department, the US Army and First Kuwaiti, Mayberry listed dozens of concerns about the clinics, which he found lacking in hot water, disinfectant, hand washing stations, properly supplied ambulances, and communication equipment. Mayberry also complained that workers’ medical records were in total disarray or nonexistent, the beds were dirty, and the support staff hired by First Kuwaiti was poorly trained.

The handling of prescription drugs especially bothered him. Many of the drugs that originated from Iraq and Kuwait were unsecured, disorganized and unintelligibly labeled, he said in one memo. He found that the medical staff frequently misdiagnosed patients. Prescription pain killers were being handed out "like a candy store ... and then people were sent back to work.”

Mayberry warned that the practice could cause addiction and safety hazards. “Some were on the construction site climbing scaffolding 30 feet off the ground. I told First Kuwaiti that you don’t give painkillers to people who are running machinery and working on heavy construction and they said 'that's how we do it.’”

The sloppy handling of drugs may have led to the two deaths, Mayberry speculates. One worker, age 25, died in his room. The second, in his mid-30s, died at the clinic because of heart failure. Both deaths may be “medical homicide,” Mayberry says -- because the patients may have been negligently prescribed improper drug treatment.

If the State Department investigated, Mayberry knows nothing of the outcome. Two State Department officials with project oversight responsibilities did not return phone calls or emails inquiring about Mayberry's allegations. The reports may have been ignored, not because of his complaints, but because Mayberry is a terrible speller, a problem compounded by an Arabic translation program loaded on his computer, he says.

Accidents Happen

Owen’s account of his seven months on the job paints a similar picture to Mayberry’s. Health and safety measures were essentially non-existent, he says. Not once did he witness a safety meeting. Once an Egyptian worker fell and broke his back and was sent home. No one ever heard from him again. “The accident might not have happened if there was a safety program and he had known how to use a safety harness.”

Owen also says that managers regularly beat workers and that laborers were issued only one work uniform, making it difficult to go to the laundry. “You could never have it washed. Clothing got really bad – full of sweat and dirt.”

And while he often smuggled water to the work crews, medical care was a different issue. When he urged laborers to get medical treatment for rashes and sores, First Kuwaiti managers accused him of spoiling the laborers and allowing them simply to avoid work, he says.

State Department officials supervising the project are aware of many such events, but apparently do nothing, he said. Once when 17 workers climbed the wall of the construction site to escape, a State Department official helped round them up and put them in “virtual lockdown,” Owen said.

Just before he resigned, hundreds of Pakistani workers went on strike in June and beat up a Lebanese manager who they accused of harassing them. Owen estimates that 375 were then sent home.

‘Treated Like Animals’

Recent First Kuwaiti employees agree that the accounts shared by Owen and Mayberry are accurate. One longtime supervisor claims that 50 to 60 percent of the laborers regularly complain that First Kuwaiti “treats them like animals,” and routinely reduces their promised pay with confusing and unexplained deductions.

Another former First Kuwaiti manager, who declines to be named because of possible adverse consequences, says that Owen’s and Mayberry’s complaints only begin “to scratch the surface.”

But scratching the surface is the only view yet available of what may be the most lasting monument to the US liberation and occupation of Iraq. As of now only a handful of authorized State Department managers and contractors, along with First Kuwaiti workers and contractors, are officially allowed inside the project’s walls. No journalist has ever been allowed access to the sprawling 104-acre site with towering construction cranes raising their necks along the skyline.

Even this tight security is a charade, says on former high-level First Kuwaiti manager. First Kuwaiti managers living at the construction site regularly smuggle prostitutes in from the streets of Baghdad outside the Green Zone, he says.

Prostitutes, he explains are viewed as possible spies. “They are a big security risk.”

But the exposure that the US occupation forces and First Kuwaiti may fear most could begin with the contractor itself and the conditions workers are forced to endure at this most obvious symbol of the American democracy project in Iraq.

David Phinney is a journalist and broadcaster based in Washington, DC, whose work has appeared in The Los Angeles Times, New York Times and on ABC and PBS.

Further Information:

Pentagon Finds Worker Abuse and Trafficking in Iraq, but Penalizes No One

On April 4, 2006, the Pentagon issued a new contracting directive following a secret investigation that officially confirms what many South Asian laborers have been complaining about ever since the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. Some contractors, many working as subcontractors to Halliburton /KBR in Iraq, were found to be using deceptive, bait-and-switch hiring practices and charging recruiting fees that indebted low-paid migrant workers for many months or even years to their employers. Contractors were also accused of providing substandard, crowded sleeping quarters, serving poor food, and circumventing Iraqi immigration procedures.

While the Pentagon declines to specifically name those contractors found to be doing business in this way, it also acknowledged in an April 19 memorandum that it was a widespread practice among contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan to take away workers passports. Holding onto employee passports -- a direct violation of US labor trafficking laws -- helped stop workers from leaving war-torn Iraq or taking better jobs with other contractors.

Contractors engaging in the practice, states the memo, must immediately "cease and deist."

"All passports will be returned to employees by 1 May 06. This requirement will be flowed down to each of your subcontractors performing work in this theater."

The Pentagon has yet to announce of any penalty for those found to be in violation of US labor trafficking laws or contract requirements.

Labor Trafficking Under US Funded Iraq Contracts

CNN: Probe into Iraq Trafficking Claims – May 5, 2004

The New York Times: Indian Contract Workers in Iraq Complain of Exploitation – May 7, 2004

The Washington Post: Underclass of Workers Created in Iraq – July 1, 2004

Support the Troops, Bring Them Home Now!


by Housewife4palestine

Every so often on the backs, windows, sides or bumpers, the many variety of magnetic ribbons that project the statement of “Support our Troops,” but it seems less often you see the ones that ask to bring American Troops home; so they stop getting their behind’s blown off and end up in a box with a flag for transport in the cargo hold of a military transport.

I think those who do not want the American’s troops in Iraq probably cannot afford to put a bumper sticker on their vehicles, they are to worried on how to feed and cloth their children.

Therefore, I found the picture above and here is my bumper sticker; bring the bums home so their mother’s stop having as many funerals as they are creating for the Iraqi populace.

Ex-aide sentenced to 18 months in prison

Former Bush administration official David Safavian leaves the U.S. District Court in Washington Friday, Oct. 27, 2006. A federal judge sentenced Safavian to 18 months in prison in the Jack Abramoff lobbying case Friday - after delivering a 30-minute eulogy for good government in Washington. Safavian, the former chief of staff for the General Services Administration, was sentenced on obstruction and concealment charges for lying to investigators about his relationship with Abramoff. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

October 27, 2006

By MATT APUZZO, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - A federal judge sentenced a former Bush administration official to 18 months in prison in the Jack Abramoff lobbying case Friday — after delivering a 30-minute eulogy for good government in Washington.

"There was a time when people came to Washington because they thought government could be helpful to people," said U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman. "People came to Washington asking not what government could do for them and their friends but what they could do for the public."

David Safavian, the former chief of staff for the General Services Administration, was sentenced on obstruction and concealment charges for lying to investigators about his relationship with Abramoff.

Safavian wept in court as he asked for leniency, but Friedman said the ex-bureaucrat had become part of Washington's culture of corruption, where congressmen listen to campaign donors and lobbyists while farming out to staff members the job of writing laws.

Abramoff, the once-powerful lobbyist, shook Pennsylvania Avenue from the Capitol to the White House when he pleaded guilty to corruption in January and began cooperating with an FBI investigation.

The case, which has become an election-year liability for Republicans, snared its first congressman this month when Rep. Bob Ney (news, bio, voting record), R-Ohio, pleaded guilty to taking expensive gifts and trips from Abramoff in return for official favors.

Friedman said he believed Safavian was a good person and could not understand why he got involved with Abramoff.

"Maybe it's hard to resist. Maybe it's hanging out with the big boys," Friedman said. "I'm not sure."

Safavian, who also worked in the White House budget office, gave Abramoff details about GSA projects and offered advice on dealing with the agency. He also accepted a cut-rate golf trip to Scotland aboard a private jet.

"Rather than putting the interest of the public first, he put the interest of Jack Abramoff first," prosecutor Peter R. Zeidenberg said.

Safavian apologized Friday for giving the appearance of impropriety but said it was not fraudulent. He said the lobbyist used and manipulated him and he never intended to hurt anyone.

"Yes, Jack Abramoff was a friend, but he wasn't my coconspirator and I wasn't his," Safavian said. "There was no conspiracy to defraud anyone, least of all the taxpayers."

That wasn't what Friedman wanted to hear. He said Safavian has taken no responsibility for his lies.

"Get up here and tell me, 'I agree I concealed. I agree I obstructed justice,'" Friedman said. "I don't believe he's done that."

Safavian argued for no jail time but prosecutors asked for a three-year sentence, saying Safavian lied on the stand. Friedman called Safavian's testimony that he didn't know the value of the Scotland trip and barely read an ethics opinion "incredible" and "hard to believe" but said it wasn't perjury.

With the lobbyist's help, the Abramoff investigation continues and prosecutors have said there are other targets.

Two former aides to Tom DeLay, R-Texas, the former House majority leader, have also pleaded guilty, as has Ney's former chief of staff.

Additionally, Roger Stillwell, a former Interior Department official, pleaded guilty in August to a misdemeanor charge for not reporting tickets he received from Abramoff.

Army of Ansar Alsunnah Executes Alleged Collaborator with IED

October 26, 2006

Video

The Army of Ansar Al Sunnah released a video showing the execution of who they claim was a mole in the group and was giving information of the groups planned activities to Coalition forces in Iraq.

The statement along with the video said they invited the member to an area in Kirkuk, Iraq to a meeting in which they would discuss future attacks and as he was comming in they detonated the IED on the vehicle.

The person was killed in the attack.

Friday, October 27, 2006

Cheney "Water Boarding, Yes or No?"

October 27, 2006

The White House denies Cheney hailed “water boarding (1)."

The White House said Friday that Vice President Dick Cheney was not talking about torture technique known as "water boarding" when he said dunking terrorism suspects in water during questioning was a “no brainier.”
__________

(1) Water Boarding is a type of torture used in coercive interrogations or for punishment. In modern practice it simulates drowning and produces a severe gag reflex, making the subject believe his or her death is imminent while ideally not causing permanent physical damage.

The practice has garnered attention and controversy in the early 21st century when reports charged that the Bush administration had authorized its use in the interrogations of U.S. War on Terrorism detainees.


President Bush said Friday the United States does not torture prisoners, commenting after Vice President Dick Cheney embraced the suggestion that a dunk in water might be useful to get terrorist suspects to talk.

Olmert Calling the Pot the Kettle Black over Iran

Editorial:

October 27, 2006

by Housewife4Palestine

Olmert comparing Iran to Nazi Germany is like the pot calling the kettle black, Israeli history especially with their occupation of Palestine has all the earmarks of the European holocaust right down to dotting all the eyes and crossing all the tees.

Olmert and his partner’s in crime since the inception of the Zionist genocide bull machine crept into the world like a plague upon humanity, they will never have an inch of respect compared to one person in any Arab country.

I will say this, Olmert sit back because you yet have a bumpy ride, for your day is coming when criminals like you will pay the ultimate price and you being bent to make remarks or accusations to anyone or country make you look like nothing but a giant fool.

The one day that people may have listened to the ramblings of these lunatic’s is sorely going to come to an end and I myself hope it is in the distant future, instead of calling the State of Israel by part of the globe; it should more likely been called, The State Hospital for the Criminally Insane.


Olmert Unless You Forget

Islam and West: An Invitation to New Way of Thinking

October 27, 2006
Fahmi Howaidi, Arabnews


Clashing with Islam and what it teaches is apparently this season’s fashion in Europe. No one seems surprised by this and sadly, few consider the consequences. Every two or three weeks, the media carries a new addition to the saga of clash of civilizations. We Muslims thought at one time that the clashes were limited to the US and were a form of reaction to the 9/11 attacks. We soon noticed, however, that the clashes had crossed the Atlantic and were becoming common in Europe. Especially was this so following the bombings in Madrid and London. Those two tragic events unfortunately strengthened the idea of a clash.

There have been several recent events in Europe that have served to keep the public aware of a clash of civilizations. The French banned the wearing of distinctive religious symbols in certain public places, notably schools. The uproar caused by the Danish cartoons, the furor resulting from the pope’s speech in Germany and the comment by the former British foreign secretary about the wearing of veils all illustrated, if not a clash, at the very least a serious misunderstanding between cultures and traditions.

These events changed the way we Muslims look at Europe and the way that Europeans look at us. People in the Middle East believed until recently that Europe was different from the US because it is geographically closer to the Arab world and therefore was more understanding and sympathetic. In addition, the Zionist community and its related organizations have greater influence on the media in the US than in Europe. There are also 20 million Muslims living in Europe whereas in the US, there are only 7.5 million. All these made it easier for Muslims to communicate with Europe and yet, as time went on, many problems and their symptoms moved from the US to Europe.

There have been attempts to circulate all kinds of baseless anti-Muslim stories that had no purpose other than to inflame passions and incite misunderstanding and hatred. Possible hazards of large Muslim communities living in the West were emphasized and this widened the gap between Islam and the West — not only in the West but also in the Muslim world. It also stifled a great deal of communication between the two. The West, of course, is not the entire world and there is much of the world that is neither Western nor Western-sympathetic. There are also elements within the West that are sympathetic to Muslims and Islam. What is difficult for us is to keep our relationship with the West strong and balanced. I emphasize the word “balanced” which means that we must not always blame the West for everything that goes wrong. We must realize that there are differences between Western countries and Western communities. We have to understand the political and cultural maps of each society and learn whom we can count on and whom we cannot.

What can we do to counter this campaign? Every time I’m asked this question, I remember that the Jewish relationship with Europe has been full of bitterness, prejudice and hatred. The persecution that Europe inflicted upon the Jews is among the darkest in the history of both Europe and the Jews. The well-known Israeli writer and peace activist Uri Avnery referred to this history in a recent article. He pointed out that Jews were oppressed and crushed by European Christians. In many cases, the Jews fled to Muslim countries where they were tolerated and allowed to live in greater peace and security than they had known in Europe. Despite this background, the Jews have succeeded in convincing the West that Israel is their ally and that Israel is an outpost of Western values and civilization surrounded by Arab enemies.

The Arab world can definitely benefit from strengthening ties with the West but we have to be cautious and careful. We must study and seek answers to questions that have been asked but never answered satisfactorily. What led the West to initiate a campaign to humiliate Muslims and their beliefs? How can we diminish the gap between us and maintain bridges of communication? What parties in the West can we establish a certain level of understanding with in order to gain fairness and justice?

We must also understand hat in order to be respected and appreciated we have to set a good example, worthy of trust. We have to examine ourselves closely and not only discover but admit our flaws and shortcomings.

We have to overcome our imperfections before we ask others to see the good in us. I don’t have a ready solution for the problem, but I call everyone to think deeply and analytically, keeping in mind the disadvantages of our present behavior and tendency to react to situations emotionally instead of logically and intellectually. It does no good for us or our cause for the Islamic world to explode into open rage and street violence when an individual or group in the West slanders or misrepresents Islam and Muslims.

Bigotry in the Name of God and Religion

October 27, 2006
Lubna Hussain, arabnews

It was truly incredible. The stuff that dreams are made of. There I was sitting in my Riyadh living room in the last week of Ramadan with two women whom I respect and revere immensely. There we were, a Christian, a Muslim and a Jew discussing in earnest what was happening to our shared world. Practitioners of three faiths that are similar in so many ways and yet have all been subverted by political elements to fulfill their own hideous ends.

“Well,” began my Christian friend, “for a start, how dare George Bush, Pat Roberston and Jerry Falwell speak for me as a decent British Protestant? I think that Christianity has been hijacked in the United States.”

“That’s strange because most Muslims would say the same thing about Islam,” I commented. “It’s almost become second nature to keep reminding everyone that Islam has been ‘hijacked’ by Osama Bin Laden and his henchmen. I am just sick and tired of having to try to explain repeatedly that terrorism and violence are not representative of what my religion stands for.”

“Oh absolutely,” she chimed in. “I know enough about Islam to know that. It’s a religion of peace for God’s sake.”

“What do you think?” I asked my Jewish friend.

“Judaism has been hijacked by the state of Israel,” she said plaintively.

I was as shocked by the matter-of-fact manner in which she pronounced her viewpoint as I was by its gravity. “What do you mean?” I asked almost subconsciously trying to correct her. Such is the effect that the media has on all our minds, it was even somehow outrageous for me, sitting in Saudi Arabia, to be faced with the hard-hitting implications of this radical politically incorrect potentially suicidal statement.

“Oh yeah,” she replied nonchalantly understanding my incredulity. “I totally believe that. It’s almost as if it has become more important for Jews these days to worship Israel than worship God. It’s like the greatest sin that exists is to say anything against Israel.”

I could not have been more stunned. “But you’re Jewish so surely you believe in Israel?”

She thought for a minute and then said, “I can’t say that I don’t believe in it.”

Seeing my expression she interrupted my thoughts with, “Not one single grain of Palestinian sand should have been taken by Israel. If the people who lived there agreed to sell the land then that’s completely different, but that’s not what happened. They just took the land by force.

“They killed people and pushed them off their land. There were massacres. There have been horrific moments. Did you know what the Israelis did to an entire Palestinian village outside of Jerusalem? They murdered all the inhabitants of Deir Yassin and you know what? They didn’t even bother to hide it so that they could terrorize the rest of the Palestinians into giving up their rights. That was the blackest day in the creation of the State of Israel,” she said emotionally, adding, “All the top leaders in Israel are terrorists.”

“For sure,” concurred my Christian friend. “It’s not like we don’t all know that politics make the strangest of bedfellows. In theory, the Jews and the American Christians hate each other. But there is a link between their Zionist goals. Let’s not forget here what the truth of the situation is.

Palestine existed before any talk of the creation of the state of Israel and yet every successive Jewish politician has talked about how there is no such thing as the state of Palestine.

“So in reality, the media always reinforces the so-called ‘threat to Israel of being wiped off the map’ when it’s ironically the opposite and Palestine has been erased from the map.”

I looked at my Jewish friend to gauge her reaction and she nodded slowly and deliberately with eyebrows raised in my direction.

“Aha,” she reiterated. “That’s right.”

“But what’s it like for you?” I asked. “I mean aren’t you targeted?”

“I’m on the shit-list,” she declared staring at me wide-eyed.

“Oh,” I said taken aback by her strong vocabulary, as she is ordinarily painfully polite.

“Nooo, I mean S H I T. It’s an acronym for Self-Hating Israel Threatening. I’ve received death threats. There are thousands of Jewish names on it featuring academics and prominent personalities who have spoken up against what’s going on. Have you heard of the campus watchdog?” she asked.

“No,” I answered.

“It was set up by Daniel Pipes in the states and is a website that has been created to get students to inform on their professors who say anything anti-US or what they deem to be anti-Semitic.”

“You’re joking?” I said astonished. “That’s just like McCarthyism!”

“Oh yes,” said my Jewish friend exasperated. “As an American Jew I can say that it’s horrifying. Israel has become the 51st state. I see my government hijacked by Christian Zionists and my religion hijacked by the state of Israel, which means that I can be sitting in the freest country in the world and yet I am not allowed to criticize. Jobs have been lost and careers have ended because of people expressing their so-called right to freedom of speech.”

“Honestly,” said my Christian friend, “Israel is much freer. You can say pretty much what you want there. Much more so than in the US.”

“So what’s the solution? How do we stop all this hatred and misunderstanding?” I asked.

“Pretty much like this,” said my Jewish friend. “The solution doesn’t come with governments or politics; it comes with ordinary people coming together seeing that we are just the same. Why do you think that the Israeli government is so paranoid about separating their citizens from the Palestinians with such huge barriers?”

“That’s definitely it,” agreed my Christian friend.

As I walked off to the mosque for the night prayer, I thought about all the times I had been targeted for criticizing the failings of people within my own faith. I marveled at how narrow-minded and bigoted some of us had become in the name of a God who created all of us. But I took comfort in the fact that a Christian, a Muslim and a Jew could still share a solid honest friendship bound by mutual love and respect.

96 U.S. Troops Dead As Sentiment on Iraq Plummets

Relatives cry by the body of a policeman in Baqouba, 60 kilometers (35 miles) northeast of Baghdad, Thursday Oct. 26, 2006. (AP Photo/Mohammed Adnan)

U.S. death toll in Iraq worst in a year

October 26, 2006

By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD, Iraq -The number of American troops killed in Iraq in October reached the highest monthly total in a year Thursday after four Marines and a sailor died of wounds suffered while fighting in the same Sunni insurgent stronghold.

The U.S. military said 96 U.S. troops have died so far in October, the most in one month since October 2005, when the same number was killed. The spike in deaths has been a major factor behind rising anti-war sentiment in the United States, fueling calls for President Bush to change tactics.

In other violence, 12 police officers were killed in fighting with suspected militia gunmen in Baqouba, northeast of Baghdad, officials said. Eighteen militants also were killed.

The deadliest month for U.S. forces in Iraq was November 2004, when military offenses primarily in the then-insurgent stronghold of Fallujah, 40 miles west of Baghdad, left 137 troops dead, 126 of them in combat. In January 2005, 107 U.S. troops were killed.

Polls show a majority of Americans are opposed to Bush's handling of Iraq, and at a news conference in Washington on Wednesday, he indicated he shared the public's frustration even as he pushed back against calls for troop withdrawals.

"I know many Americans are not satisfied with the situation in Iraq," Bush said. "I'm not satisfied either."

Gen. William B. Caldwell, the U.S. military spokesman, said there had been a marked decrease in violence in Baghdad since the end of Ramadan, the Muslim month of fasting, earlier this week.

Caldwell said violence has in the past tended to spike during that month, then fall off. He also said it was possible increased U.S. patrols and roadblocks in the search of a missing American soldier could be having an effect.

"Everyone is asking this very same question ... whether this is occurring naturally or is it due to the fact that we in fact established and are conducting these additional operations," he said.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said the United States would increase its support for Iraqi security forces.

"We intend to increase their budgets," he said, as well as their capabilities, and officials will work to help make the improvements more quickly. He did not cite any figures.

Rumsfeld also said people ought to "just back off" and stop demanding specific benchmarks or timelines for progress in Iraq, saying it is just too difficult to predict when the Iraqis can take control of security.

Fighting continued Thursday with fresh clashes between Iraqi security forces and militia groups linked to major Shiite political parties, part of an ominous new trend adding to the violence wrought by the Sunni-led insurgency against U.S. coalition forces and their Iraqi allies.

At least 12 policemen were killed in fighting near Baqouba pitting Iraqi security forces against gunmen of the Mahdi Army militia, who are loyal to fiery anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. At least 18 militants also were killed, said Ghassan al-Bawi, police chief of surrounding Diyala province.

Mahdi militiamen have flooded into the area 35 miles northeast of Baghdad, forcing large numbers of residents belonging to Iraq's Sunni Arab minority to flee their homes. Mahdi fighters killed scores of Sunnis in massacres last week in the nearby city of Balad, forcing U.S. troops to return to the area after Iraqi security forces were unable to stem the bloodshed.

The U.S. military said the five service members killed in volatile Anbar province included a sailor assigned to the 3rd Naval Construction Regiment. Two of the Marines were attached to Regimental Combat Team 5, and two others to Regimental Combat Team 7. All died from wounds suffered in attacks Wednesday in Anbar province, a hotbed of the Sunni insurgency.

According to Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, about 300 Iraqi police and soldiers died during Ramadan, while altogether, more than 961 Iraqis have been killed in war-related violence this month, the highest level since The Associated Press began tracking civilian deaths in April 2005.

That amounts to an average of more than 41 each day, compared with a daily average of about 27 since April 2005, as more Iraqis fall prey to sectarian death squads affiliated with the militias.

The AP count includes civilians, government officials and police and security forces, and is considered a minimum based on AP reporting. The actual number is likely higher, as many killings go unreported. The United Nations has said 100 Iraqis are being killed each day.

Held in Iraq

Prisoner: "Doctor why don’t we get better medical treatment?"

Doctor: "What do you expect, you're in an occupied country with a puppet government."

Contemplating Why?


by Housewife4Palestine

I sit and wonder why
A little, teardrop about my eye
Thinking-
So many people have to die
They may be different
So am I
So why please God
Do they have to die?

Thursday, October 26, 2006

Ramadan Spirit Should Continue

The blessed month of Ramadan which purified the believers spiritually as well as physically is soon getting over. The wonderful days with more divine acts are leaving from us for this year. Older to younger people, utilised the opportunity and there is blissful atmosphere everywhere, especially in the Muslim countries.

But why is it that the spirit the believers had in the month of Ramadan fades away slowly. It is the prime duty of every Muslim to go through the wonderful life of the holy Prophet (PBUH), his family and beloved companions and to strive to improve their spiritual, economic, social and political well-being and to make this world a better world for all man-kind.

When we are looking into our mind and heart, there is whole universe, emotions, desires, urges and instincts. The heart is the one, which is pumping motivations, desires and urges and makes man do what he wants to do. Hence, one should surrender completely to Allah and his Messenger, the holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). This pure love is a blessing given to us by the Almighty which cannot be measured by quality, or mathematical formula of equations. It is a powerful force and it captives us, grips us and makes us to live in an orderly manner.

Faith (Iman) is important which must penetrate deep in our heart and generate love for Allah and the Prophet (PBUH) more than anything else and this will help us be peaceful, anywhere. Our acts of worship should be only for Him to be carried out with love and complete devotion, only then faith will remain strong at heart.

The sacred month would have definitely increased one’s power of concentration, mental, physical, spiritual strength and this should continue in the coming months also.

The great Imam Jamaliya Seyed Khaleel Awn Mowlana El Hasaniyul Hashimiy has said, “Ire, jealousy and self-pride are man’s enemies that destroy him. Entire mankind is a single race. Differences caused by castes must vanish. Those who practice such differences as obligatory or for the sake of oppression must be eradicated. God does not differentiate among people by caste nor does He mete out punishment on its account. He sees only man’s heart. Man must possess unity, freedom and brotherhood. His heart must be pure .

If all Muslims lead their lives as per the way the holy Prophet (PBUH) has shown, we will be successful and leaders always in the world."

Israel Will Have It's Day


Warning: Beware of Thin Ice & Slippery Banks!

Living With Propaganda?

Germany Eyes Incident With Israeli Jets

October 25, 2006

By DAVID McHUGH Associated Press Writer

BERLIN (AP) - The German Defense Ministry said Wednesday it is investigating an incident in which two Israeli fighter jets allegedly fired shots and dropped flares near a German warship patrolling the Lebanese coast as part of a peacekeeping force.

German officials said the planes _ two F-16s _ fired two shots and released the flares, which can be used as a defense measure against heat-seeking missiles, said a ministry spokesman. He did not identify the vessel.

Israeli officials deny that the jets fired shots at the German ship.

The Israeli Defense Ministry said in a statement that Defense Minister Amir Peretz spoke by telephone Wednesday evening to German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung about the reports.

"The defense minister made it clear that Israel did not fire at any German aircraft or ship," the statement said. "The defense minister told his German colleague that Israel has no intention of carrying out any offensive acts against German forces."


The Israeli military told The Associated Press that an Israeli aircraft had approached a German vessel Tuesday morning when a helicopter took off from its deck without having informed Israeli authorities in advance, but that no shots were fired.

The Israeli Defense Ministry statement said Peretz told Jung there was a need for improved coordination, both directly between Israel and the German task force and through the U.N. peacekeeping force.

A German naval task force led by the frigate Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania is off the coast of Lebanon seeking to prevent weapons smuggling as part of the UNIFIL peacekeeping force set up to secure a U.N.-brokered cease-fire that ended 34 days of fighting between Israel and Lebanon-based Hezbollah guerrillas in southern Lebanon on Aug. 14.

Germany joined the peacekeeping force but did not send ground troops, in part out of worries that they might come in conflict with Israeli troops _ a sensitive point given Nazi Germany's role in carrying out the Holocaust during World War II.

Zionistic Bush Signs Fence Bill


Bush signs U.S.-Mexico border fence bill

Bush signed a bill Thursday authorizing the construction of a fence along one-third of the 2,100 U.S. border with Mexico, but missing from the legislation is the means to pay for it.

Israel prisoner treatment condemned

Palestinians have campaigned for prisoner releases

26 October 2006

Aljazeera

An Israeli human rights group has accused the government of violating international law by moving Palestinian prisoners out of the occupied territories.

B'Tselem, a body that monitors human rights in the West Bank and Gaza, said in a report released on Thursday that most of the 9,000 Palestinians being held by Israel were illegally imprisoned inside the Jewish state.

"The vast majority of Palestinian prisoners are held in prisons inside Israel, and not in the occupied West Bank,in contravention of international humanitarian Law," said B'Tselem's communications director, Sarit Michaeli.

"In order to guarantee basic human rights, they should be transferred to prisons in the West Bank where Palestinians are allowed to travel," she said.

Israel occupied the West Bank and Gaza in the 1967 Middle East war and although it withdrew soldiers and Jewish settlers from Gaza in August last year.

Since it is often very difficult for Palestinians to get permits to enter Israel, prison visits end up taking place only every few months.

Checks and delays when they do happen can mean that a visit of a few hours can take up to 24 hours to carry out.

"Israel's arbitrary and disproportionate policy not only infringes the right to family visits, it also results in violation of other rights and principles of international humanitarian and human rights law," said the report, entitled "Barred from Contact".

Security issues

Israel's prison system said in response it made all efforts to allow family visits to take place in a "respectful manner".

"(The prison system) also acts in accordance with laws and regulations to check proof of identity meticulously, especially in light of recent events," said a spokesman, Yaron Zamir, referring to the stabbing of a guard by a prisoner's relative.

In a response sent to B'Tselem in August, the Justice Ministry said it did everything possible, within the constraints of security, to facilitate visits and said that it had denied only 41 of 4,616 visits requested since December 2005.

"The state has been acting relentlessly, despite the many security and administrative difficulties involved, to enable the existence of these visits," it said.

The ministry did not directly address the allegation of the illegality of holding the prisoners in Israel.

Two Palestinians injured in IOF shooting

October, 26, 2006

Gaza - Two Palestinians were wounded last night and at an early hour Thursday in IOF gunfire in Beit Hanun and Jabalia to the north of the Gaza Strip one of whom was reportedly in a serious condition.

A special IOF unit late last night opened fire at a group of AMB fighters near Jabalia wounding its commander.

In Beit Hanun, Suhail Al-Majdalawi was seriously wounded when IOF snipers fired at a group of Palestinians near the Beit Hanun crossing. Locals present at the scene said that there was no justification for the shooting.

Meanwhile, Israeli gunboats fired at Palestinian fishing boats off the Gaza beach early Thursday preventing fishermen from heading to fish at sea.

In the West Bank, an IOF spokesman said that his soldiers arrested 20 Palestinians at dawn Thursday in Al-Khalil, Ramallah, Tulkarm and Nablus.

He claimed that the arrested youths were members in Hamas, Islamic Jihad, PFLP and the AMB.

West Bank Occupiers Attack Farmers

Hisham Abu Taha, Arab News

GAZA CITY, 26 October 2006 — Scores of Jewish extremist occupiers brandishing guns, rocks and metal bars in the West Bank terrorized unarmed Palestinian farmers sending many to hospitals in what has become an annual scene of violence during the olive harvest season.

Ibrahim Salah said about 30 of his family members were tending to their field west of Nablus when some 50 Israelis descended on the area wielding rocks, metal bars, and guns. He said his son Basel Salah, 31, was hit in the head with a metal bar and taken to a local hospital. According to witnesses, many others were also wounded. Each year Palestinian farmers in the West Bank are worried that fundamentalist Jewish occupiers living in illegal settlements nearby will disrupt and destroy their annual olive harvest — a mainstay of the local economy.

Israeli troops arrived shortly after the incident and dispersed the crowd, evacuating Basel Salah to a hospital in an army jeep, the army said. There were no immediate details on his condition. The incident occurred near Havat Gilad, one of 24 illegal Jewish settlements built on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank.

Israeli police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said three Palestinians were wounded in yesterday’s violence. Rosenfeld blamed the Palestinian farmers for the violence saying they should have coordinated with Israeli authorities to arrange an escort. The olive harvest usually has large outputs every two years, and this year is expected to yield a bumper crop, making it essential to the economic survival of cash-strapped Palestinians under a brutal Israeli occupation. Extremist illegal Jewish occupiers are known to frequently destroy crops adding to the misery of local Palestinians.

In another development, an Associated Press photographer was released unharmed early yesterday after a harrowing day in the hands of gunmen who abducted him in Gaza and dressed him in women’s clothes before transporting him from one secret location to another.

Emilio Morenatti, 37, was brought before midnight to the office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas by Fatah officials. It was not immediately clear who kidnapped him, though officials said he was taken by criminal elements. The government and main Palestinian groups denounced the abduction.

Morenatti looked fatigued after his daylong ordeal. He said he was tired but otherwise unharmed.

“I’m tired but happy to have come back because there were very anguished moments,” said Morenatti.

He said the kidnappers kept him in a small room, where he was held for about four hours during which he was visited by masked men. Later he was put in a car dressed as a woman.

See the Similarities?

A ghetto during the time of Nazi Germany.



Hebron, Palestine

Is Zionism doing the same thing as Nazi Germany, decide for yourself?

A large number of the populace say's, YES!

Some even equate, that the American government; as going hand in hand with the same policies?

-----------

Anytime there is inhumanity to man for what ever the excuse it is a crime beyond the human imagination and I for one am yet to understand with the long history of these crimes why it keeps going on and is never stopped nor made a final situation towards a unified people of love and respect instead of continues parade of rotting bones laying in the streets?

These kinds of crime's have not only happened to the Jewish people I am sorry to say but to about every culture and religion known to man.

For me not just being Palestinian and Muslim for this crime to be happening to my country, but to think a people who say they are Jewish; while in truth are nothing but a political machine bent on the genocide of a whole people so reminiscent to the Jewish holocaust that it is sure to create nightmares for those who the effects and consequences of both is a reminder.

I use to ask when I was a child, when this kind of atrocities was going to stop…I am still asking?

For those who are true to their Jewish religion and stand against these horridness events, there is gratitude.



War on poverty slips from election agenda

A boat washed up by Hurricane Katrina sits next to a tree near a house in New Orleans October 17, 2006. Hurricane Katrina exposed an underclass of poor Americans to the rest of the world, but poverty has slipped off the agenda in the runup to midterm congressional elections next month. (Matthew Bigg/Reuters)

October 25, 2006

By Matthew Bigg

NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - On a boat stranded in a street in New Orleans, two words are scrawled: "No politicians."

It's not clear if the boat is a remnant of Hurricane Katrina, which devastated this city more than a year ago, but the message of the graffiti is unmistakable: politicians failed to deliver for those who lost their homes in the hurricane.

"They sent boys over there (to Iraq) to fight in a war that never ends. Why didn't they keep the money over here when Americans are suffering," said Gwen Brown, 51, whose home in New Orleans was flooded by Katrina.

Hurricane Katrina exposed an underclass of poor Americans to the rest of the world, but poverty has slipped off the agenda in the runup to midterm congressional elections next month.

"After the hurricane it was easier for a time (to interest people in poverty) but it is ... very hard to maintain national attention unless there is national leadership," former Democratic senator John Edwards said in an interview.

Edwards ran for president in 2004 arguing there were two Americas, one for the well-off and another for those who struggle. When that effort failed, he ran for vice president on John Kerry's ticket. He said he has not decided whether to run again in 2008.

Poverty has been a Democratic issue since President Lyndon Johnson declared a "war on poverty" in 1964, but Edwards said Democrats see risks in promoting the issue, fearing they would be painted as big-government spenders.

An illustration of that is Harold Ford, running for the U.S. Senate for Tennessee, who campaigns on reforming health care but also advocates issues attractive to conservative voters such as opposition to gay marriage and cutting taxes.

U.S. civil rights leader Jesse Jackson warned there were dangers for Democrats who abandoned social justice issues to win elections.

"There is a need to have politicians whose positions represent change for the better and not an accommodation with the worst of our status quo," he told Reuters.

DOES POVERTY EXIST?

The U.S. Census Bureau said in August one in eight Americans and one in four black people lived in poverty last year.

In all, some 37 million Americans lived below the poverty line, defined as having an annual income around $10,000 for a single person or $20,000 for a family of four, it said.

Robert Rector of the conservative Heritage Foundation think-tank argued there is little actual poverty in the United States and most poor people had a house, car, television, air conditioning, food and medical care.

Democrats only employed the word to stir emotions and "low income status" would be a better description in most cases, Rector said in an interview.

That case gains traction in the United States, a society with a fiercely competitive ethic and a belief that hard work and self-reliance are a sure route to success, making it risky to promote a national goal of helping the poor.

What makes it still harder is that the religious right has hijacked the agenda for Christian voters promoting opposition to abortion and gay marriage but pushing poverty off the agenda, said Jim Wallis, leader of Sojourners, a Christian ministry that promotes spiritual renewal and social justice.

Wallis cited recent research by the Center for American Values in Public Life which indicated that 85 percent of Americans say poverty and affordable health care are more important issues than abortion and same sex marriage.

"The conventional wisdom is that poverty isn't sexy and that nobody wants to talk about poverty ... You need political leaders with the courage to test the proposition," he said.

For many voters in New Orleans, talk of political courage may come too late to dent their cynicism.

Near the stranded boat, the owner of a newly-rebuilt house near the stranded boat has created a mock Hurricane Katrina cemetery, with colorful headstones bearing epitaphs for local politicians and President Bush. One reads: "Bush rebuilt the city -- Baghdad."

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Israel admits using phosphorus bombs during war in Lebanon

October 22, 2006

By Meron Rappaport, Haaretz Correspondent

Israel has acknowledged for the first time that it attacked Hezbollah targets during the second Lebanon war with phosphorus shells. White phosphorus causes very painful and often lethal chemical burns to those hit by it, and until recently Israel maintained that it only uses such bombs to mark targets or territory.

The announcement that the Israel Defense Forces had used phosphorus bombs in the war in Lebanon was made by Minister Jacob Edery, in charge of government-Knesset relations. He had been queried on the matter by MK Zahava Gal-On (Meretz-Yahad).

"The IDF holds phosphorus munitions in different forms," Edery said. "The IDF made use of phosphorous shells during the war against Hezbollah in attacks against military targets in open ground."

Edery also pointed out that international law does not forbid the use of phosphorus and that "the IDF used this type of munitions according to the rules of international law."

Edery did not specify where and against what types of targets phosphorus munitions were used. During the war several foreign media outlets reported that Lebanese civilians carried injuries characteristic of attacks with phosphorus, a substance that burns when it comes to contact with air. In one CNN report, a casualty with serious burns was seen lying in a South Lebanon hospital.

In another case, Dr. Hussein Hamud al-Shel, who works at Dar al-Amal hospital in Ba'albek, said that he had received three corpses "entirely shriveled with black-green skin," a phenomenon characteristic of phosphorus injuries.

Lebanon's President Emile Lahoud also claimed that the IDF made use of phosphorus munitions against civilians in Lebanon.

Phosphorus has been used by armies since World War I. During World War II and Vietnam the U.S. and British armies made extensive use of phosphorus. During recent decades the tendency has been to ban the use of phosphorus munitions against any target, civilian or military, because of the severity of the injuries that the substance causes.

Some experts believe that phosphorus munitions should be termed Chemical Weapons (CW) because of the way the weapons burn and attack the respiratory system. As a CW, phosphorus would become a clearly illegal weapon.

The International Red Cross is of the opinion that there should be a complete ban on phosphorus being used against human beings and the third protocol of the Geneva Convention on Conventional Weapons restricts the use of "incendiary weapons," with phosphorus considered to be one such weapon.

Israel and the United States are not signatories to the Third Protocol.

In November 2004 the U.S. Army used phosphorus munitions during an offensive in Faluja, Iraq. Burned bodies of civilians hit by the phosphorus munitions were shown by the press, and an international outcry against the practice followed.

Initially the U.S. denied that it had used phosphorus bombs against humans, but then acknowledged that during the assault targets that were neither civilian nor population concentrations were hit with such munitions. Israel also says that the use of "incendiary munitions are not in themselves illegal."

A Little to Much Cell Phone?

The Latest Falsehood from the Advocates of Civilizational War

Not All Terrorists are Muslim

October 24, 2006

By M. SHAHID ALAM


"While it may be true--and probably is--that not all Muslims are terrorists, it also happens to be true that nearly all terrorists are Muslim."

Dan Gillerman, Israeli Ambassador to the UN, March
7, 2006


Terrorism has long been the chief demonizing marker that Israel and the United States have used in their wars against Islamic states and peoples who have stood in the path of their imperial ambitions.

Israel has led the way in charting this course. With massive propaganda, the Zionists succeeded in equating the Palestinian resistance with terrorism. In no Western country did this propaganda encounter greater success--including Israel itself--than in the United States. Most liberal Americans--and a few leftists--argued that Palestinian terrorists threatened Israel's existence.

After the capitulation of Egypt at Camp David, Israel pursued more lofty ambitions. The original dream of a Pax Israelica, stretching from Morocco to Pakistan, now seemed within reach. Only the newly emerging Islamist forces in the region--notably, in Iran--now stood in its way.

The nascent Islamists offered both a challenge and an opportunity to Israel. If Israel could paint the Islamists as a civilizational threat to the very survival of the West, the American voters could be goaded into supporting Israel's war against the Islamists: or better still, make this war their own.

This is not to discount the lure of Middle Eastern oil for America's power elite. Although the US is the world's only superpower, its relative economic position has been declining for some time. Although the US may not reverse its economic decline, it could solidify its power by gaining control over the world's oil spigot in the Persian Gulf. Europe and China could be tamed if they knew that the US had its hand on the oil spigot.

This temptation was strong, but it also carried risks. In a democracy, moreover, there stands another obstacle. Public opinion in the United States would resist such a major and risky war. Americans, therefore, would have to be prepared for war by conjuring fears of new Islamic hordes gathering to attack and destroy the West, especially the United States.

Israel, the Zionists and their neoconservative allies in the United States began to work on these fears. It would not be too difficult to revive the West's old obsession about fanatical Muslims, forcing their religion upon infidels at the point of their swords. But these atavistic fears would have to be decked anew. The Zionist and neoconservative thinkers would go to work painting Islam as anti-modernist, opposed to freedom, and inimical to the rights of women and minorities. In other words, Muslims were the last remaining obstacle to the final and irreversible triumph of Western values and power.

This was not all. The Zionists also argued that the Muslims were an active and growing threat to the survival of the West. The new forces gathering under the Islamic banner were determined to attack the West. Israel was only their immediate target. After destroying Israel, they would go for the United States and Europe, their real targets. Their goal was nothing less than the imposition of Islamic law on Western Christendom. Most importantly, the Zionists warned repeatedly, the Islamists would use terror--the same tactics they had employed so long against Israel--to destroy the Western economies.

This strategy could scarcely fail to achieve its objective. On the domestic front, Americans were being told constantly of Islamic hostility to modernity, to the West and the United States especially. On the international front, the US and Israel together deepened their siege of the Islamic world, with open wars against Palestinians, Lebanese, Iraqis, Afghans, and threats of new wars against Iran, Syria and Pakistan.

Under these dire circumstances, small groups of Muslims--no more than a few hundred at first--broke away from the mainstream Islamist movements who were battling the repression and corruption of their own governments. These splinter groups advocated attacks against the United States, the 'far enemy' that they argued was the real power behind Israel and the indigenous tyrannies.

When these splinter groups began their terrorist attacks in the early 1990s, the Zionists, neoconservatives, and other assorted right-wing reactionary groups had gained what they waited for. Here was proof, they proclaimed, of the malevolent designs of the Islamic terrorists, the Islamic fundamentalists, nay, of the entire Islamic world. Wake up, the Zionists began telling the Americans. The Islamic terrorists who have been attacking us since 1948 have now attacked you. We face the same terrorist hordes. It is the Islamic world, stupid.

So, when the nineteen hijackers from al-Qaida attacked the Twin Towers, renewed efforts were launched to establish a definitive connection between Islam and terrorism. Some voices proclaimed that all Muslims are terrorists or at least potential terrorists. The US government was not going that far yet. It proclaimed that it was waging war against Islamic terrorists, not against Islam.

What the US government did after 9-11, however, sent exactly the opposite message. It launched a war against Iraq, a secular Arab government, opposed to the Islamists and with no known connection to the perpetrators of 9-11. It gave up its pretense of playing the honest broker between Israel and the Palestinians. It launched plans to effect 'regime change' in Syria and Iran. US intentions in the Middle East were summed up ominously in its plans to bring 'democracy' to the region. The real plan--long a part of Israel's strategic plan for the region--was to redraw the map of the Middle East.

The advocates of civilizational war in the United States were not yet resting on their laurels. They had not achieved quite what they wanted. They wanted all-out, open war against the Islamic world. They wanted the US to equate Islam with terrorism, and Muslims with terrorists. They wanted to deport Muslims who called the West their home, or shut them up in internment camps. They wanted to legalize the torture of Muslims, and their indefinite detention. Indeed, they were celebrating the loss of their own liberties as a necessary tool in the war against Islam.

Unremittingly, Israel, the Zionists and neoconservatives are pushing the United States to start the total war against Islam. They work openly, covertly and by deceit. On the ideological front, their goal is to define all Muslims as terrorist. This goal appears to be nearly in sight. They have persuaded many Americans that all terrorists are Muslims even if all Muslims are not terrorists.
A tenuous distinction indeed, if there was one. If all terrorists are Muslims, and we cannot tell the bad ones from the good ones, can we then afford to give 'good Muslims' the benefit of the doubt? Can the West risk its survival on so fine, so tenuous a distinction? Should the West risk its survival on this distinction?


The charge that all terrorists are Muslims is a scarcely concealed advocacy for war against all Muslims. It does not matter that this equation is false. The claim that Saddam Hussein had WMDs was also false; so was his connection with the 9-11 hijackers. But these lies were used to invade, occupy and devastate Iraq. If this new falsehood prevails, and it appears to be gaining ground, this is what will drive the war against Islam--the most deadly after the second World War. Duped into rage, Americans will stand four square behind the war of the twenty-first century to defeat the Islamo-fascists, to eradicate the Islamic terrorists. Once this is over, they can enjoy the glories of yet another American century.

M. Shahid Alam is professor of economics at Northeastern University, and author of Challenging the New Orientalism: Dissenting Essays on America's 'War Against Islam' (IPI Publications: 2006 forthcoming).