Saturday, June 23, 2007

The New Immigration Bill Revised

Office of the Press Secretary
June 23, 2007


Audio

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This week, Senate leaders introduced revised legislation on comprehensive immigration reform. I thank leaders from both parties for their bipartisan effort to fix our immigration system so it can meet the needs of our Nation in the 21st century.

As the Senate takes up this critical bill, I understand that many Americans have concerns about immigration reform -- especially about the federal government's ability to secure the border. So this bill puts the enforcement tools in place first. And it means more Border Patrol agents, more fencing, more infrared cameras and other technologies at the border. It also requires an employee-verification system based on government-issued, tamper-proof identification cards that will help employers ensure that the workers they hire are legal.

Only after these enforcement tools are in place will certain other parts of the bill go into effect. To make sure the government keeps its enforcement commitment, the bill includes $4.4 billion in immediate additional funding for these border security and worksite enforcement efforts.


The bill also addresses other problems with immigration enforcement. Right now, our laws are ineffective and insufficient. For example, crossing the border illegally carries weak penalties. In addition, participation in illegal gangs is not enough to bar admission into our country. And when we cannot get other countries to accept the return of their citizens who are dangerous criminals, in most cases our government can only detain these aliens for six months before releasing them into society.

This is unacceptable. The bill before the Senate addresses these problems. Under this bill, those caught crossing illegally will be permanently barred from returning to the United States on a work or tourist visa. Under this bill, anyone known to have taken part in illegal gang activity can be denied admission to our country. And under this bill, we will be able to detain aliens who are dangerous criminals until another country accepts their return.

These enforcement measures are a good start. Yet even with all these steps, we cannot fully secure the border unless we take pressure off the border. Hundreds of thousands of people come here illegally because our current work visa program does not match the needs of a growing and dynamic economy. To discourage people from crossing our border illegally, this bill creates an orderly path for foreign workers to enter our country legally to work on a temporary basis.

With this program in place, employers will have a practical system to fill jobs Americans are not doing -- and foreign workers will have a legal way to apply for them. As a result, they won't have to try to sneak in. And that will leave border agents free to chase down drug dealers, human traffickers, and terrorists.

Once the border security and worksite enforcement benchmarks are met, the bill will resolve the status of 12 million people who are now in our country illegally. Under this bill, these workers will be given an opportunity to get right with the law. This is not amnesty. There will be penalties for those who come out of the shadows. If they pass a strict background check, pay a fine, hold a job, maintain a clean criminal record, and eventually learn English, they will qualify for and maintain a Z visa. If they want to get a green card, they have to do all these things -- plus pay an additional fine, go to the back of the line, and return to their country to apply from there.

This bill provides an historic opportunity to uphold America's tradition of welcoming and assimilating immigrants and honoring our heritage as a Nation built on the rule of law. We have an obligation to solve problems that have been piling up for decades. The status quo is unacceptable. We must summon the political courage to move forward with a comprehensive reform bill. By acting now, we can ensure that our laws are respected, that the needs of our economy are met, and that our Nation treats newcomers with dignity and helps them assimilate.

I urge members of both parties to support comprehensive immigration reform. By working together, we can pass this good bill -- and build an immigration system worthy of our great Nation.

Thank you for listening.

END



Further Reading:

Senate makes new try for immigration bill

Labels:

Are You A Know-It-All?


No one gives their opinion with more zeal than an ignorant person. The person who knows it all, has a lot to learn.

Labels:

Wealth and Poverty


Overabundance of Money


Wealth and poverty are Divine gifts. Wealth is corrupted by forgetfulness, poverty by greed.

[al Qushayri]



Man counting money (Central Dhaka, 2002).

Labels:

The Best of You...And Meet Shabina Begum

(Adam Butler, AP, 2005/03/02)"British Muslim schoolgirl Shabina Begum, 16, leaves The Royal Court of Justice in London, Wednesday March 2, 2005, after a panel of three judges in the Court of Appeal ruled that her human rights were violated by her school's ban on her wearing the jilbab, a long, flowing gown covering all of her body except her hands and face."
Video

The best of you are those who, when seen, remind people of Allah.

[Bukhari]

Labels: ,

Israeli Army kidnaps three civilians from Hebron

23 June 2007

by Ghassan Bannoura

The Israeli army attacked several areas of the southern West Bank city of Hebron and kidnapped 3 Palestinian civilians on Saturday morning.


In Hebron city center, soldiers attacked and searched a building then kidnapped Fahid Ghaith and Nader AL Jamal, and took them to unknown dentition camps.

In the meantime, another force attacked homes in the nearby Al Shukh village, just outside the city. Troops left after searching several homes and kidnapping Idrees Al Halika.

Labels: ,

What Did Happen to Islam Khateeb?


The child on this photo is 8 years old, and her name is Islam Mahmoud Al Khateeb. Her family found her body buried in the sand near the Jewish settlement. Her body was burned and they found evidence of violence on her body.

The parents do not know who committed this crime, but since the body of her child was found near Tal Al Sultan, Rafah, where the Israeli soldiers live, they suspect the child was killed by soldiers or settlers and then buried in the sand.

Translation of the text on this poster:

A question, who is responsible for that terrorism??! She went from her house on 21/5/2002, she went as a flower and innocent girl, and in that way, we find her naked in the sand, with many injuries in her body, we found her on 1/6/2002.

Signature: All the people of Rafah and Tal Al Sultan area. And her family. And also her name: Islam Mahmoud Al Khateeb, 8 years old.

Lastly, this blog Administrator.

Source

Labels:

Hamas movement claims to uncover proof of Fatah security services' "collaboration with Israel"

23 June 2007

Gaza - Ma'an – The Hamas movement has revealed what it claims to be files, tape recordings and photos proving the involvement of the (Fatah-loyal) preventive security and Palestinian intelligence services "in dangerous conspiracies and acts".

In a press conference in Gaza on Friday evening, Khalil Al Hayieh, a prominent Hamas leaders, declared that "The Hamas movement has thousands of documents and files, photos, tape recordings, CD's and many other things, which prove the involvement of the intelligence and the preventive security in dangerous issues."

He added that these will be revealed and exposed when the investigative Arab fact finding committee arrives to study the recent incidents in the Gaza Strip.

He described the findings as "very important information which condemns officials and officers in these bodies." Al Hayieh accused the security bodies of collaborating and cooperating against Hamas with the Israel and the US, in addition to many other countries.

Al Hayieh accused the security bodies of not only spying on the Hamas movement, "but also on Arab countries and officials, including ministers and strategic sites". He also leveled accusations against the security bodies of dealing with drugs, forged money and spying on the late President Yasser Arafat, as well as Mahmoud Abbas.

In the packed press conference, Al Hayieh added that the security service's main job had been "fighting the resistance, spying on its members and cooperating with Israel in this regard." He also stated that the Fatah-affiliated services "had been informing Israel about the tunnels under the borders of the Gaza Strip, and the methods used by resistance fighters in reaching their targets in Israel."

He further alleged that Mohammad Dahlan has been cooperating with Israeli Prime Minister Olmert, and receiving aid from him. "Many of the documents we found were written by Dahlan; these documents were in his own handwriting".

Labels:

Israel to Offer Abbas ‘Package of Gestures’




23, June, 2007

by Mohammed Mar’i

RAMALLAH, West Bank, 23 June 2007 — Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will bring a “package of gestures” for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas during Monday’s summit in Sharm El-Sheikh, reports said yesterday. The summit, which will also be attended by Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Jordan’s King Abdallah, is meant to show support for Abbas and the emergency government he formed in the West Bank this week.

At tomorrow’s weekly Cabinet meeting, Olmert will ask the ministers to approve a decision to resume talks with Abbas government, headed by Salam Fayad. Israel suspended contact with the Palestinian Authority government when Hamas won the Palestinian parliamentary elections 18 months ago. Resuming ties will be dependent on the Fayad government’s accepting the conditions posed by the Quartet of Middle East peacemakers — recognizing Israel, disavowing violence and honoring previous agreements.

Ahead of the Cabinet session, Olmert will meet with Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni to finalize the proposed concessions to Abbas. He will also hold consultations with the army top brass. The proposed “package of gestures” will center on releasing tax monies that Israel collected on the PA’s behalf but withheld after Hamas’ election. It remains unclear which part of the $600 million in question will be transferred to Palestinian coffers.

In the meantime, Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Avigdor Lieberman of the extremist right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu party has slammed the Israeli government’s “package of gestures.” “Past experience shows that supplying Fatah with weapons and funds has increased terror rather than stifling it,” the hawkish minister told Israel Radio.

“It has been proved that transferring arms and money to Fatah strengthens terror elements. Even if we supply Abbas with F-16 jets he has no power or chance,” said the minister. However, following the establishment of a new emergency government headed by Fayyad, the United States and Europe have resumed financial aid to the Palestinians, prompting Olmert to allow the flow of funds into the PA.

An Israeli government source said that more concessions would be offered, but that a prisoner release is not on the agenda.

Further Reading:

Israeli authorities to provide up to $1Billion to President Abbas to continue domestic fight against Hamas movement

Labels: , ,

Let’s Not Be a Gossip



No one who carries tales about others will go to Paradise.
[Bukhari & Muslim]

Labels:

Army officer: Guantanamo hearings are flawed

Military evidence sometimes not credible, he says in affidavit for detainee


In this 2006 file photo, reviewed by a US Department of Defense official, detainees stand together at a fence at Camp Delta prison, at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, Cuba. The Bush administration is nearing a decision to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and move the terror suspects there to military prisons elsewhere, The Associated Press has learned.

22 June 2006

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico - An Army officer with a key role in the U.S. military hearings at Guantanamo Bay says they relied on vague and incomplete intelligence and were pressured to declare detainees “enemy combatants,” often without any specific evidence.

His affidavit, released Friday, is the first criticism by a member of the military panels that determine whether detainees will continue to be held.

Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham, a 26-year veteran of military intelligence who is an Army reserve officer and a California lawyer, said military prosecutors were provided with only “generic” material that didn’t hold up to the most basic legal challenges.



This handout image obtained 21 June 2007 shows the cover of the book "Poems from Guantanamo: The Detainees Speak." Poems scratched on Styrofoam cups and written with toothpaste by inmates at the US "war on terror" prison in Guantanamo Bay will soon be printed in a book, the publishers said 20 June 2007. "Poems from Guantanamo: The Detainees Speak," published by University of Iowa Press, includes 22 works by 17 prisoners at the US naval prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The works were collected by volunteer lawyers for the detainees -- most of whom remain in the prison -- and translated into English for publication under the scrutiny of the US Department of Defense. The cover is from a photograph made by Agence France-Presse photographer Paul J. Richards, showing leg restraints in an interview room 05 December 2006 on the US Naval base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. The profits from the book will be given to the Center for Constitutional Rights which has taken up the detainees cases.


Despite repeated requests, intelligence agencies arbitrarily refused to provide specific information that could have helped either side in the tribunals, according to Abraham, who said he served as a main liaison between the Combat Status Review Tribunals and those intelligence agencies.

“What were purported to be specific statements of fact lacked even the most fundamental earmarks of objectively credible evidence,” Abraham said in the affidavit, filed in a Washington appeals court on behalf of a Kuwaiti detainee, Fawzi al-Odah, who is challenging his classification as an enemy combatant.

Pentagon: Process is fair

The Pentagon defended its process of determining which detainees should continue being held but didn’t address Abraham’s criticism.

“The CSRT process is fair, rigorous and robust,” said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Chito Peppler, a Defense Department spokesman. “We welcome dialogue and fact-based discussion” in the military tribunal hearings, he added.

An attorney for al-Odah, David Cynamon, said Abraham “bravely” agreed to provide the affidavit when defense lawyers contacted him. “It proves what we all suspected, which is that the CSRTs were a complete sham,” Cynamon said.


Inside Guantanamo

Click above link to view images cleared by the U.S. military from within the prison at Guantanamo.

Matthew J. MacLean, another al-Odah lawyer, said Abraham is the first member of a Combat Status Review Tribunal panel who has been identified, let alone been willing to criticize the tribunals in the public record.

“It wouldn’t be quite right to say this is the most important piece of evidence that has come out of the CSRT process, because this is the only piece of evidence ever to come out of the CSRT process,” MacLean said. “It’s our only view into the CSRT.”

Abraham said he first raised his concerns when he was on active duty with the Defense Department agency in charge of the tribunal process from September 2004 to March 2005 and felt the issues were not adequately addressed. He said he decided his only recourse was to submit the affidavit.

Officer cites 'duties as a citizen'
“I pointed out nothing less than facts, facts that can and should be fixed,” he told The Associated Press in a telephone interview from his office in Newport Beach, Calif.

The 46-year-old lawyer, who remains in the reserves, said he believe he had a responsibility to point out that officers “did not have the proper tools” to determine whether a detainee was in fact an enemy combatant.

“I take very seriously my responsibility, my duties as a citizen,” he said.

Cynamon said he fears the officer’s military future could be in jeopardy. “For him to do this was a courageous thing but it’s probably an assurance of career suicide,” he said.

The military held Combatant Status Review Tribunals for 558 detainees at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay in 2004 and 2005, with handcuffed detainees appearing before panels made up of three officers. Detainees had a military “personal representative” instead of a defense attorney, and all but 38 were determined to be “enemy combatants.”

Abraham was asked to serve on one of the panels, and he said its members felt strong pressure to find against the detainee, saying there was “intensive scrutiny” when they declared a prisoner not to be an enemy combatant. When his panel decided the detainee wasn’t an “enemy combatant,” they were ordered to reconvene to hear more evidence, he said.

Ultimately, his panel held its ground, and he was never asked to participate in another tribunal, he said.

In April, the Supreme Court declined to review whether Guantanamo Bay detainees may go to federal court to challenge their indefinite confinement.

Lawyers for the detainees have asked the justices to reconsider and included Abraham’s affidavit in a filing made Friday. The administration opposes the request.

Labels:

Depopulation Hebron

Samah El-Shahat presents the People & Power Middle Eastern season


The alleys in Hebron's old market area, once bustling with shoppers and vendors, now keep the company of shadows and maybe the odd echo. Located in the Judea region of the West Bank, it is one of the oldest cities in the Middle East.

But now Hebron reflects the brutality of the Israeli-Arab conflict. In a decade, the population in the market area has decreased by 80 per cent, leaving just 3,500 people. Local residents blame the Israeli occupation for the mass migration.

People & Power visit this so-called 'ghost town', and speak to Israeli settlers and the few remaining Palestinian residents about the politically volatile situation.



Coffee in Cairo



Starbucks is moving into Egypt, but can it outdo the successful Cilantro chain?


Starbucks has become a name synonymous with coffee. But that is not the case everywhere. Egypt, for example, was Starbucks free ... until now. So far its residents have existed on a diet of sheesha and local coffee.

Howard Schultz's Starbucks seems to be unstoppable – it has grown far beyond its original marketing target of 2000 outlets by the year 2000. In fact, in 2005 it had 12,000 stores in 37 countries - accounting for a turnover of $6.37 billion.

But success might not be so easy in Cairo. Two young Egyptian entrepreneurial upstarts may stand in their way. In 2000, long before the advent of Starbucks in the country, they started a coffee chain, Cilantro – which swiftly grew to 21 stores.

People & Power examines just how an indigenous coffee culture is challenging the imperial ambition of an American coffee mogul.

This episode aired 20 June 2007


Part 1



Part 2

Labels: , ,

Israel to take measures to strengthen Abbas against Hamas

22 June 2007

From Khalid Amayreh in Occupied East Jerusalem

The Israeli apartheid regime will take a set of “far-reaching” measures to strengthen Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas against the Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, the Israeli media reported Friday.

Hamas-backed militiamen last week defeated American-armed and financed Fatah forces in the Gaza Strip, taking control of their security headquarters and confiscating large amounts of arms and military equipment.

Israeli newspapers reported that Israel would transfer to Abbas’s office in Ramallah hundreds of millions of dollars of frozen Palestinian tax revenue returns withheld by Israel ever since Hamas’s election victory in 2006.

The Haaretz newspaper reported that the measures would be announced during a four-way summit meeting to be held in Sharm el-Sheikh under the auspices of Egyptian President Husni Mubarak, with the participation of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Abbas, King Abdullah of Jordan .

Jordan King Abdullah II, Egyptian President Husni Mubarak Abbas are closely associated with the American policy in the Middle East .

According to Ha’aretz, the proposed “Package of gestures” will include releasing frozen Palestinian money, removing some secondary checkpoints and roadblocks in the West Bank as well as the possible suspension of extra-judicial assassinations targeting Fatah fighters in the West Bank .

Israel might also release some Fatah prisoners in order to increase Abbas’s popularity among Palestinians.

This week, several Israeli officials, including two former cabinet ministers, publicly called for the release of imprisoned Fatah leader Marwan el-Barghouthi, now spending a five life-term sentence in an Israeli jail for resisting the Israeli oppression of Palestinians and occupation their homeland.

However, the Shin Beth has voiced opposition to the idea of releasing Bartghouthi on the ground that his release might undermine the status of Dahlan within Fatah. Barghouthi advocates cooperation with Hamas and is firmly opposed to compromising Palestinian national constants, including full Israeli withdrawal from 100% of the occupied territories and resolving the refugee problem pursuant UN resolution 194.

Other “concessions” to Abbas reportedly include encouraging investors, primarily from the Arab to build industrial plants in the West Bank and giving the American government a green light to supply Abbas with more advanced arms.

Other Hebrew sources also indicated that Israel might be willing to pressure the Bush Administration to ask Saudi Arabia and other oil-rich Arab countries such as Qatar , and the United Arab Emirates to increase their financial aid to the PA and stop financial assistance to the elected Hamas-led government.

The Ha’aretz newspaper also quoted an unnamed “defense official” as saying on Thursday that the army “is leaning toward maintaining the current quality of arms in the West Bank ” which means allowing Abbas’s regime to replace decommissioned weapons only.

The United States and Israel have openly embraced the “emergency government” of Salam Fayyad, a favorite of the West, formed earlier this week to replace the Gaza-based National Unity government headed by Ismael Haniya.

The US, which imposed a draconian blockade on the West Bank and Gaza Strip following Hamas’s election victory last year, has been trying to undo the outcome of Palestinian elections by arming and giving large amounts of money to Muhammed Dahlan for the express purpose of undermining Hamas rule.

On 8 February, Hamas and Fatah reached a power-sharing agreement in Mecca which paved the way for the formation of a national unity government.

However, the Bush administration silently rejected the agreement on the ground that it left Hamas in a predominant position at the Palestinian political arena.

Subsequently, Elliot Abrams, the American Jewish official in charge of the “Palestinian file,” reportedly connived with Dahlan and his allies within Fatah to carry out a coup against Hamas in the Gaza Strip for the purpose of eliminating Hamas and the National Unity government once and for all.

According to documents seized by Hamas at the Fatah intelligence headquarters at Tel el Hawa (henceforth Tel al Islam), Dahlan was to carry out the coup on 13 July.

Abrams, who is reportedly answerable to AIPAC, the powerful American Jewish lobby, wanted to achieve two main goals, apart from undoing the Mecca Agreement and ending the unity government: These include, first, igniting a large-scale Palestinian civil war in both in Gaza and the West Bank in order to enable Israel to tell the world that “how can we make peace with Palestinians while they are killing each other?!!.”

The civil war, especially an extended one, would also enable the Jewish state to build more Jewish-only settlements and complete the Judadization of Jerusalem, including the possible demolition of the Aqsa Mosque.

And second, Elliot Abrams, probably in concert with right and far-right circles in Israel, hoped that by having a “moderate Palestinian leadership”, e.g. Dahlan, Abbas, et al, and by eliminating any opposition to Dahlan within Fatah, the US and Israel would be able to impose a “lasting solution” on the Palestinians.

According to confidential information obtained from reliable sources within Fatah, such a solution would include the following components: First, the creation of a quasi-Palestinian state on 60 % of the West Bank made up of three enclaves or Bantustans in the northern, central and southern parts of the West Bank; Annexation to Israel of the vast bulk of Jewish settlements, including Ma’ali Adomim, Ariel and Gush Itzion; renting other settlements such as Kiryat Arba for 99 years; East Jerusalem would remain under the Israeli occupation; and no Palestinian refugees would be allowed to return to their homes and towns in what is now Israel.

The outlines of the solution Israel and the US are contemplating also include giving the “moderate” Palestinian government, e.g. Abbas and Dahlan, billions of dollars for economic recovery, ostensibly to silence expected opposition to the sell-out.

Fatah and PA officials have vehemently denied that they will ever accept such a deal.

One officials who asked that his name not be mentioned said: “Yes, we receive money and arms from America , but that doesn’t mean that we are going to accept everything the Americans are demanding.”

Labels: , , ,

Fatah Torturing Hamas "Executive Force" Members


Advertisement for the information below.




June 20, 2007

Contributed by Ahmad

A Must See Video which, in an Orwellian way, is presented by Western Media as Hamas torturing Palestinians. But when you see the people being tortured, they are wearing shirts of Hamas' "Executive Force." So, it is totally the opposite! Black propaganda at its worst.

Any one who speaks Arabic can tell that the torturers are Dahlan's thugs. After beating the Hamas people viciously, they force them to chant for Dahlan, "With our lives and blood we will redeem you o Dahlan!" Also at the end they force them to chant,"Hamas is Shiite, Hamas is Shiite!" Which of course is not true, but it is supposed to put Hamas in the Iranian camp; a sleazy sectarian attempt. Is there any doubt that Israel is behind this thug Dahlan??

This is unbelievable duplicity by western media to turn things totally upside down.


Note:

The above information is supplied by the contributor and not by the blog administrator. Please be warned that the video shows men being tortured and is not for children.


Update:
I came across information that this video is authentic, the men being tortured was apart of Hamas’s “Executive force.” The men attacking these men are associated with Dahlan and Abbas, along with the United States and Israel.

While this whole situation is very heartbreaking, what even makes it more so, is these same men that was being tortured was later executed by their captures.

How these men ended up in the position that was seen in the video, was they were kidnapped off the street.

Labels:

Zionist settlers uproot 300 olive trees in Qariout


22 June 2007

NABLUS, - Extremist Jewish settlers from the settlement outpost called A'ame A'ad near Nablus uprooted 300 olive trees belonging to local Palestinians and replanted them inside the post.

Eyewitnesses told PIC correspondent that the settlers uprooted the trees from lands belonging to the villagers of Qariout to the south of the northern West Bank city of Nablus. It has transpired later that the settlers replanted about half of the uprooted trees on the road leading to the outpost and on lands the settlers have confiscated from Palestinian owners to build their settlement.

The A'ame A'ad outpost lies less than two miles from Shvut Rahil settlement which is populated by Jewish immigrants from Russia and Brazil.

Palestinian farmers have on numerous occasions complained of the settlers criminal acts against their land, which include uprooting trees and burning crop fields.

Olive trees are highly regarded by Palestinians; to many villagers they are their sole source of income. The olive tree takes a number of years of nurturing before it starts yielding fruit.

Labels:

Quartet to discuss Palestinian future

June 22, 2007

by Steven Erlanger

JERUSALEM: Diplomats from the United States, European Union, Russia and the United Nations plan to meet Tuesday in Jerusalem, a day after the Israeli and Palestinian leaders meet with the leaders of Egypt and Jordan in Sharm el Sheik, Egypt, according to Israeli, Russian and UN officials.

Both meetings are scheduled to discuss the impact that the seizure of power in the Gaza Strip by Hamas, the radical Islamic group, will have on the region and the Israeli-Palestinian relationship.

The four envoys from what is known as the Quartet, charged with promoting Middle East peace, will not be at the foreign-minister level, but will try to remain unified on their attitude toward Hamas. The United States and European Union classify Hamas as a terrorist organization and will not deal with it, while Russia does. Moscow, like Saudi Arabia, has been urging the Quartet to put a national unity government between Hamas and Fatah back together.

But Washington has thrown full support behind the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, of Fatah, and his naming of a new, non-Hamas emergency government in the West Bank. The Egyptian summit meeting will also support Abbas, and Israel is expected to offer to hand him back much of the Palestinian tax money it refused to pass on to a Hamas-led government.

Abbas has said he would not negotiate any longer with members of Hamas, whom he called "murderous terrorists" who attempted a coup and even tried to kill him, charges Hamas has repeatedly denied.

Israel separately said that it continued to evacuate badly wounded Palestinians from Gaza for medical treatment inside Israel and was delivering milk, animal feed, medical supplies and fuel oil to Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing, since the main crossing at Karni remains shut. Israel says the Palestinians have not organized the Karni crossing at their end; Hamas officials say they are prepared to do so, but Israel does not want to coordinate with them.

UN aid agencies said in Geneva on Friday that it was vital to reopen Karni, which can handle up to 200 trucks a day, to avoid a longer-term crisis. Kerem Shalom can only handle 15.

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, June 22, 2007

Injured Soldier’s


Graphic looks at U.S. soldiers wounded during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; also looks at number of amputees by branch. You need to take note, that the latest body count in Iraq is not being reflected here.

Labels: , ,

Genocide of Chechen Muslims



(Nasheed - "Sheshaan")

"Whoever amongst you sees an evil, he must change it with his hand; if he is unable to do so, then with his tongue; and if he is unable to do so, then with his heart; and that is the weakest form of Faith". (Hadith: Muslim)

"Whoever saved a life, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind" (Quran 5:32)






Labels: ,

ISRAEL: White House Hopefuls on Iran

June 7, 2007

JPost.com is sending a series of questions on matters of importance to Israel and the Jewish world to the declared Democratic and Republican candidates for the presidency next year. Click here to read answers to the first question. This question, No. 2, is about the Iranian threat. Five Democrats and four Republicans submitted answers. The Democrats: Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois; Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York; Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware; former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina; and Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico. The Republicans: former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani; Sen. John McCain of Arizona; former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts; and Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas.

Question 2: How would you grapple with Iran's nuclear drive?

Barack Obama: When I traveled to Israel last year, I met with Israelis across the political spectrum and heard the diversity of views for which Israel is famous. But on one issue, there was consensus: a deep concern about the threat posed by an Iran armed with nuclear weapons.

Israelis are right to be concerned. A nuclear weapon in the hands of this radical theocracy could have dire consequences: a nuclear arms race drawing in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey; pressure on other nations to accommodate Iranian demands; emboldened terrorist groups acting under an Iranian nuclear umbrella; and, perhaps, the proliferation of nuclear technology to other states and terrorist groups.

For Israelis, the threat is even more pronounced in light of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's denial of the Holocaust and chilling call for Israel to be "wiped from the map." Israel does not have the luxury of treating these threats as mere rhetoric. Neither should the United States.

Unfortunately, recent findings by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) suggest that Iran has made considerable progress - more than had been realized - toward mastering the technology required to build nuclear weapons. So the need to address this threat is urgent.

In facing such a threat, no President of the United States should take any option, including the military option, off the table. But at this stage, our first line of offense must be a sustained, aggressive, coordinated diplomatic effort to make clear to Iran the costs of its current path.

The current strategy of ignoring Iran and issuing threats through intermediaries has not worked. I would engage Iran in direct, bilateral discussions - much as we negotiated with the Soviet Union throughout the Cold War. In these discussions, we should make clear to Iran that its continued pursuit of nuclear weapons will lead to greater isolation, and increased economic pressure. At the same time, we must communicate directly with the Iranian people, who are not as radical as their government, letting them know the opportunities for cooperation that exist if their government ends its current destructive policies.

Our diplomatic offensive must include stronger multilateral actions as well. The UN Security Council has sanctioned Iran twice in the past year, but it is time to ratchet up the pressure. We must push Iran's trading partners in Europe and energy suppliers in the Gulf states to use additional economic leverage against Iran, and we must demand that the Russians and Chinese focus on the serious threat to their interests posed by a nuclear Iran. We need to build this pressure over the coming weeks and months, not months and years.

And we can do more on our own. I am pushing Congress to pass my bill that makes it easier for state and local governments to divest their pension funds of companies that invest in Iran's energy sector, providing the revenue Iran uses to pursue nuclear weapons and sponsor terrorism. Divestment is a useful tool to bring additional economic pressure to bear on Iran.

Finally, showing Iran we are serious means maintaining close diplomatic and military relationships with our allies in the region. In Israel's case, that means providing our full military assistance package and continuing our cooperation with Israel in the development of the missile defense technology that Israel needs to defend itself.

Hillary Clinton: Iran poses a threat to our allies and our interests in the region and beyond, including the United States. The Iranian president has held a conference denying the Holocaust and has issued a series of bellicose statements calling for Israel to be wiped off the map. His statements are even more disturbing and urgent when viewed in the context of the regime's quest to acquire nuclear weapons.

The Iranian regime also uses its influence and resources in the region to support terrorist elements. Hizbullah's attack against Israel last summer, using Iranian weapons, clearly demonstrates Iran's malevolent influence even beyond its borders. In light of this threat to our security, US policy must be clear and unequivocal: We cannot permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons; no option can be taken off the table.

We must continue to put pressure on Iran through economic sanctions. I recently joined Sen. Frank Lautenberg in sponsoring a measure to strengthen existing sanction provisions in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which prohibits American companies from conducting business with nations that sponsor terrorism. Some American companies have exploited a loophole in the law by creating foreign subsidiaries to do business with rogue nations like Iran. Our legislation would close the loophole.

Among other options that should be pursued is a process of direct engagement with Iran, as recommended by many, including the Iraq Study Group. During the Cold War, we spoke to the Soviet Union while thousands of missiles were pointed at our cities. That was a smart strategy used by Republican and Democratic Presidents, which worked to the benefit of our national security, even though it was often a difficult one.

I am encouraged that the Administration is now engaging in talks with Iran but hope that they will include the nuclear issue among the items that they raise with the Iranians. As we face the refusal of Iran to suspend their nuclear ambitions, we need to deliver a strong message that we will not stand by and tolerate this behavior. We should be able to deliver that message forcefully through direct talks.

Rudy Giuliani: (Editor's note: Remarks were said on Tuesday during a GOP debate in New Hampshire when asked about the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons to prevent Iran from going nuclear): Part of the premise of talking to Iran has to be that they have to know very clearly that it is unacceptable to the United States that they have nuclear power. I think it could be done with conventional weapons, but you can't rule out anything and you shouldn't take any option off the table.

And during the debate the other night, the Democrats seemed to be back in the 1990s. They don't seem to have gotten beyond the Cold War. Iran is a threat, a nuclear threat, not just because they can deliver a nuclear warhead with missiles. They're a nuclear threat because they are the biggest state sponsor of terrorism and they can hand nuclear materials to terrorists.

And we just saw it just last week in New York, an attempt by Islamic terrorists to attack JFK airport; three weeks ago, an attempt to attack Fort Dix. These are real problems. This war is not a bumper sticker. This war is a real war.

Joe Biden: Iran with the bomb could spark an arms race in the Middle East, with Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Syria joining in. Given the fault lines - between Sunni and Shia, Israelis and Palestinians, Persians and Arabs, Turks and Kurds, fundamentalists and moderates - that's the last thing we need. And it's the last thing Israel needs.

No President should take any option off the table, including force. But we have time: Iran is years away from having a bomb and a missile to deliver it. We need to use the time wisely.

We have to keep our eyes on the prize: preventing Iran from getting the bomb. This administration spent five years obsessed with the idea of getting rid of the Iranian regime.

None of us like the regime, but think about the logic: We want you to renounce the bomb - and by the way, when you do we're still going to try to take you down. The result: Iran accelerated its efforts to get the bomb and it is much closer now than it was when President Bush took office.

We need a policy that isolates Iran, not America and tips the balance in Iran against pursuing nuclear weapons. That means keeping our allies, Russia and China on the same page as we ratchet up economic and diplomatic pressure on the government to stop pursuing nuclear weapons. At the same time, there are growing fissures within the ruling elite - we need to exploit them.

Above all, we have to recognize that our biggest allies in this effort are the Iranian people. They're open to America. They don't like a regime that denies them basic political and social rights and that can't deal with corruption, unemployment and inflation. The Iranian people need to know it is their government, not the US that is choosing confrontation over cooperation. So we should tone down the rhetoric and talk. It's amazing how little faith this administration has in America's ideas and ideals.

Force must be the last option because it's a bad option. First, with our forces bogged down in Iraq, our threat to use force doesn't look very credible. Second, we can set back Iran's program but not stop it. Using force would lead to retaliation by Iran, including against our troops in Iraq. It would cause the Iranian people to rally behind Ahmadinejad and the extremists. Third, even a "limited" strike would be perceived as something much bigger by the Iranians and could spark a real war. The only thing worse than a poorly planned intentional war is an unplanned unintentional war.

John McCain: The world's chief state sponsor of international terrorism, Iran defines itself by hostility to Israel and the United States. It is simply tragic that millennia of proud Persian history have culminated in a government today that cannot be counted among those of the world's civilized nations.

When the president of Iran calls for Israel to be wiped off of the map, or asks for a world without Zionism, or suggests that Israel's Jewish population return to Europe, or calls the Holocaust a myth, it is clear that we are dealing with an evil man and a very dangerous regime.

Teheran's continued pursuit of nuclear weapons clearly poses an unacceptable risk. Protected by a nuclear arsenal, Iran would feel unconstrained to sponsor terrorist attacks against any perceived enemy. Its flouting of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty would render that agreement obsolete, and could induce Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and others to reassess their defense posture.

Moderate Gulf states would have to accommodate the new reality, and the world would live, indefinitely, with the possibility that Teheran might pass nuclear materials or weapons to one of its allied terrorist networks. Coupled with its ballistic missile arsenal, an Iranian nuclear capability would pose an immediate and existential threat to the State of Israel.

UN Security Council action is required to impose progressively tougher political and economic sanctions.

Should the Security Council continue to drag its feet, the US must lead a group of like-minded countries in imposing multilateral sanctions outside the UN framework. The opposition of Russia and China to effective sanctions on Iran - and on issues ranging from Myanmar to Darfur to North Korea - is why I proposed the creation of a league of Democracies in which Israel would be welcomed. When democracies are united in addressing threats like Iran, we cannot afford to allow autocracies to thwart action.

There are many ways to increase pressure on Iran. Financial sanctions have had an initial effect. Iran's need to import refined gasoline, to cite one example, suggests an important vulnerability. And countries such as China and Malaysia, which have signed deals to develop Iranian gas fields, and Russia, which provides weapons systems to Teheran, should know that Iran would be a critical element in American's bilateral relations with each nation. In the meantime, the US should immediately investigate whether any of these deals violate the terms of last year's Iran Freedom Support Act.

The US should also privatize the sanctions effort by launching a divestment campaign. By persuading individuals, pension funds, and financial institutions to divest from companies doing business with Iran, we can isolate and delegitimize a hostile government. We will also, as we did with the South Africa divestment campaign, increase the debate inside the country about whether the present course serves the interests of the Iranian people or merely those of a misguided elite.

Americans and all proponents of freedom need to reassure the millions of Iranians who aspire to self-determination that we support their longing for freedom and democracy. There is much more we can and should do to translate such support into concrete action.

Every option must remain on the table. Military action isn't our preference. It remains, as it always must, the last option. We have some way to go diplomatically before we need to contemplate other measures. But it is a simple observation of reality that there is only one thing worse than a military solution, and that is a nuclear-armed Iran. The regime must understand that it cannot win a showdown with the world.

Mitt Romney: Iran is an intolerant, repressive regime that is developing nuclear weapons, supports terrorism and is located right near much of the world's oil and natural gas. I believe that radical Islamic jihadists and the spread of weapons of mass destruction represent the greatest threat to the world since the fall of the Soviet Union and, before that, Nazi Germany. That threat would take on an entirely new dimension if Iran were allowed to develop nuclear weapons.

In January, I discussed the threat of Iran at the Herzliya Conference. Since then, Iran has done little to change its dangerous course. It has continued to operate its nuclear program in defiance of the United Nations Security Council. It has issued a new banknote that features a red nuclear symbol superimposed on the map of Iran.

On April 9th, Iran marked a new national holiday - "Nuclear Day." Recently the press reported Iranian President Ahmadinejad's statement that the countdown to Israel's destruction had begun. Clearly, this is a regime that is unrelenting in its pursuit of nuclear weapons and a threat to the world

To aggressively combat Iran's nuclear ambitions and exploit the regime's vulnerabilities, I have outlined a five-pronged strategy:

First, we should tighten economic sanctions. Denying Iran access to the international banking system is crucial. The US and Europe should ensure that Iran finds it very difficult to obtain credit and make purchases in foreign currencies. In addition, I have called for strategic divestment among state pension funds from companies that support the Iranian regime's dangerous actions.

Second, we should isolate Iran diplomatically. Of course, we keep communication channels open. Yet until there are indications that high level engagement would do anything other than reward bad behavior, America should not engage Iran in direct, bilateral negotiations over their nuclear weapons program that legitimize Iran's defiance of the world. As part of this effort, Iran's President Ahmadinejad should be indicted under the terms of the Genocide Convention for incitement to genocide.

Third, Arab states must join this effort to prevent a nuclear Iran. These states should support Iraq's government; turn down the temperature of the Arab-Israeli conflict; stop the financial and weapons flows to Hamas and Hizbullah; and tell the Palestinians to drop their terror campaign and recognize Israel's right to exist.

Fourth, we must make it clear to the Iranian people that while nuclear capabilities may be a source of pride, it can also be a source of peril. The military option must remain on the table. The regime should know that if nuclear material from their nation falls into the hands of terrorists and is used, it would provoke a devastating response from the civilized world.

Fifth, our strategy must be integrated into a broader approach to the Muslim world. We must work with moderate Muslim communities and leaders to build a lasting Partnership for Prosperity and Progress - a global effort which would support progressive Muslim communities and leaders in every nation where radical Islam is battling modernity and moderation. This Partnership for Prosperity should help provide the tools and funding necessary for moderates to win the debate in their own societies. In the final analysis, only Muslims will be able to permanently defeat radical Islam. But we can and should support this effort.

John Edwards: The situation in Iran has only gotten worse under this Administration's approach. Recently, Iran's hardliners rejected the UN's second resolution imposing new sanctions on Iran. Then, Ahmadinejad went ahead and announced his country had started enriching uranium on an industrial scale. Clearly, we need a new direction.

The situation is deadly serious, but there is a path forward. We need to continue to contain Iran through measures that will force the nation, over time, to finally understand the world community will not allow it to possess nuclear weapons.

You should never tie the hands of an American president or take any option off the table, but instead of focusing on military action, we should focus on the many steps in front of us that have not been used. Every major ally agrees a nuclear Iran is unacceptable, and both China and Russia recently voted with the UN Security Council to impose sanctions on Iran. We should continue to work with all these parties to help us put a system of carrots and sticks in place.

We first need to be negotiating directly with Iran. Communication will give us more information and more control. At the height of the Soviet Union, we still talked with the Kremlin, and we talked with China at the height of tensions. It's good that the Administration has just begun to talk with Iran, but in many ways these short talks are too little, too late. We need a fundamental re-engagement of the country.

For carrots, we should make nuclear fuel available to Iran and control the cycle, but allow Iran to use the fuel for any civilian purpose. Second, we need to offer an economic package. The Iranian economy is already struggling, and this would be very attractive to the people.

And, for sticks, we need to threaten much more serious economic sanctions if Iran continues its nuclear operations. We also need to take steps to isolate Ahmadinejad, so that the moderates and those within the country who want to see Iran succeed economically, can take advantage of it.

Sam Brownback: Ahmadinejad and the mullahs match genocidal rhetoric with proud defiance of international objections to their nuclear program. Their acquisition of nuclear weapons would constitute a threat to the security of the United States and the free world. This dangerous situation requires that all options remain on the table, demonstrating a credible and unwavering commitment to an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

The regime should understand the consequences of intransigence. We should speak directly to Iran and make our objections to its behavior clear. We should not negotiate with the regime, however, until it stops enriching uranium and supporting terrorism.

Our strong words should support strong actions. I propose a three-pronged solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis: squeeze the regime economically, undermine it politically, and expose it morally.

First, economic sanctions: We can and must de-fund the regime's ability to build and sustain a nuclear program.

As president, I would enforce all sanctions authorized in the Iran Sanctions Act, including against Russian, European, and Chinese corporations and financial institutions that invest in the Iranian oil and gas sectors. I would also call for additional sanctions and penalties included in the Iran Counter-Proliferation Act, of which I am a cosponsor. I also believe we should encourage individuals, corporations and other countries to divest from Iran.

Second, political pressure: We must overhaul our public diplomacy efforts in Iran and challenge the regime's cynical manipulation of the nuclear issue. The Iranian people should hear that we support their desire for progress and better technology and stand with them in opposing the regime's drive for nuclear weapons. This will require US broadcasts that beam fewer hours of Britney Spears music and spend more time reporting on the regime's corruption and ineffectiveness. The Iranian people want democracy and we should give them the tools they need to reform their country from within.

Third, human rights: Any regime that relies on secret police, censorship, imprisonment, and torture to maintain its grip on power ought not be trusted to maintain a "peaceful, civilian nuclear program." The Iran Human Rights Act of 2007 ( S.1534), which I introduced earlier this month, outlines ways to leverage human rights and undermine the regime's credibility inside Iran and among the community of free nations.

Bill Richardson: Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons. But preventing Iran from going nuclear will require strong diplomacy backed by credible power and clarity of purpose. It also will take realism: above all, we must understand that no nation has ever been forced to renounce nukes, but that many have been persuaded to do so with a combination of carrots and sticks.

We need to approach the Iranian nuclear problem with both fierce determination and with open eyes. The key is to make them see that they will be better off and more secure without nukes than with them.

If we unite the world behind the right carrots and sticks, and provide the Iranians with face-saving ways to step back from the nuclear brink, we will prevail.

As we know from the Cold War, deterrence is above all a matter of clarity and credibility. We need to be absolutely clear that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable, and we need to be absolutely credible when we say what we will do about it if the Iranians continue to disregard the will of the international community.

The clear message must be this: develop nukes and you will face devastating global sanctions which will damage your economy and weaken you politically; desist from developing nukes and you will receive meaningful rewards, including robust security guarantees (above all from the United States), diplomatic recognition, better access to international credit and investment, guaranteed supplies of nuclear fuel from abroad, and an end to trade sanctions.

This sort of engagement, with a stick in one hand and a carrot in the other, is how we got Libya to renounce nukes, and this is how we must approach Iran.

For this message to be credible, the United States needs the solid support of the Europeans, China, and Russia in support of UN Security Council resolutions. If all these parties join us in sanctions, they will work. If they do not join us, they will not work. Russia is the key, because of its substantial economic interests in Iran, such as the Bushehr nuclear reactor.

Preventing Iran from going nuclear is inevitably linked to the power struggle between hardliners like President Amadenejad, on the one hand, and pragmatists and moderates in the Iranian leadership, on the other.

If we can keep Russia on board, the moderates and pragmatists will be strengthened. They will be further strengthened if we make sure that Iran can save face as it renounces nuclear enrichment. This is possible: Iran insists that it only wants nuclear energy, not weapons. Accordingly, a solution that guarantees them secure supplies of enriched uranium, to be monitored by the IAEA, may become politically palatable.


Source

Labels: , ,

Prisoner on his own land

The house that Yasser built after Israel forceswithdrew from the Gaza Strip

June 7, 2007

By Nour Odeh in Beit Lahiya

It has never been easy for Palestinians living close to Jewish settlements in the occupied territories but the hardships have continued for those living in the Gaza Strip even after the Israeli withdrawal.

Nour Odeh, Al Jazeera's correspondent in the Gaza Strip, went to meet Yasser al-Harazine a farmer in Beit Lahiya in the north of the territory who says he still feels like a prisoner in his own home.

Al-Harazine has worked his fields in the northern Gaza Strip since 1952. The father of 18 children, has also been a prisoner on his own land for much of the past seven years.


Since 2000 Al-Harazine's family has been one of 35 Palestinian families caught within the extended borders of the former Israeli settlement of Dugit.

"Our lives have been very difficult. We were not allowed anywhere near the al-Dugit settlement on the outskirts of Beit Lahiya except with a permit. There is a checkpoint and body search," he told Al Jazeera.

"Sometimes the fate of the 35 families living here is connected to the presence of a dog. Every time we try to cross over with our belongings they bring a sniffer dog. If there is no dog, we have to leave behind our food and stuff until a dog can be brought later."

Optimistic

Al-Harazine was optimistic when the Israeli army left the Gaza Strip and demolished the settlements, including his haunting neighbour Dugit.

He built a five-storey home for his large family but his enjoyment of the new found freedom ended abruptly.


Al-Harazine with a shell that fell on hisland during several months of Israeli shelling


For months, his land and crops were again off limits, this time because of non-stop Israeli shelling. He still has the empty tank shells and shrapnel.

In October 2006, Israeli forces came back. Al-Harazine and his family were confined to one room of their home as soldiers took it over and used it as a command post.

And just last month, the Israeli soldiers came back again, this time they ordered Al-Harazine and his family out of their home confining them to a small room close to the sheep they raise. They stayed there for nearly three weeks.

"The land is ruined, it's too dry now. All these crops are wasted, there is no possibility of having irrigation water," he says. "I lost at least $10,000."

The Israeli soldiers also left their mark inside his home. They drilled holes in the wall and when they left they warned him not to fix them because they would be coming back.

But Al-Harazine still looks forward to the next planting season.



Labels:

United States: Sex offenders younger, more violent

June 9, 2007

By
KIM CURTIS

STOCKTON, Calif. - Courts have seen the number of sex offense cases involving juvenile offenders rise dramatically in recent years, an Associated Press review of national statistics found, and treatment professionals say the offenders are getting younger and the crimes more violent.

Some psychologists blame the increase in numbers — 40 percent over two decades — on a society saturated with sex and violence and the fact that many of the accused were themselves victims of adult sexual predators. Others say there aren't more children committing such crimes, simply more awareness, better reporting and a general hysteria about sex offenders.

"I don't think it's appropriate to suggest we have whole schools full of sexual predators ... but we're seeing more of it and more sexually aggressive acts," said Scott Poland, past president of the National Association of School Psychologists. "How do these kids even know about this? It's permeated throughout our society."

Robert Prentky, a psychologist and nationally renowned expert on sex offenders in Bridgewater, Mass., thinks the statistics are misleading.

"There aren't more kids, there are more laws," he said. "We now have fairly draconian laws with very harsh sanctions that apply to juveniles."

The number of children under 18 accused of forcible rape, violent and nonviolent sex offenses rose from 24,100 in 1985 to 33,800 in 2004, the AP's analysis found. Violent offenses include attempted rape and sexual assault, while nonviolent offenses including fondling, statutory rape and prostitution.

By comparison, rape and sexual assaults by adults decreased more than 56 percent from 1993 to 2004. Comparable statistics were unavailable before 1993.

The AP analyzed state and federal crime statistics, as well as independent research on juvenile sex offenders. Sources included the U.S. Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Statistics; the National Center for Juvenile Justice, a Pennsylvania-based nonprofit that specializes in statistical and policy research; and The Safer Society Foundation Inc., a Vermont nonprofit that works to prevent sexual abuse.

Sharon Araji, an Alaska psychologist who took one of the first broad looks at the problem in her book "Sexually Aggressive Children," thinks the number of child-on-child sex crimes is actually even higher than the statistics indicate.

Only 28 percent of all violent sexual assaults are reported to police, according to a 1999 National Crime Victimization Survey. And cases of incest between siblings are widely thought to be underreported and may drive the numbers even higher, Araji says.

"The whole society is not yet up on this problem," Araji said. "These kids, on the extreme end, if nothing is done to catch them, they're going to become our adult offenders of tomorrow."

Studies show that one in two sex offenders began their sexually abusive behavior as juveniles.

The rise in juvenile sex offenders has spawned hundreds of new treatment facilities for children as young as 5.

In 2002, there were 937 programs in the U.S. treating adolescent offenders — generally ages 12-17 — up from 346 in 1986.

During the same period, the list of programs specifically aimed at children under 12 grew from zero to 410, according to The Safer Society Foundation.

However, Franklin Zimring, a juvenile justice expert at the University of California, Berkeley, thinks many children are unnecessarily treated as sex offenders. True pedophiles are extremely rare among young people, he says.

"As long as the public temperature is up, you're going to get more referrals from the courts for treatment," he said. "If you don't want to lock a kid up, treatment is a politically safe outcome."

Many experts agree that some amount of sexual exploration by young people is healthy, a line is crossed when force and violence are involved, they say.

Recent incidents include the cases of two 13-year-old boys in Omaha, Neb., who were accused in January of videotaping their assault of two 5-year-old girls and a 3-year-old boy, and of an 8-year-old Buffalo, N.Y., boy accused of assaulting a 6-year-old boy after he saw a prison rape scene in an R-rated movie.

In Alaska, lawyer Dennis Maloney calls it an epidemic.

His state has one of nation's highest per capita rates of youth sex offenders in treatment and one of the highest rates of treatment programs per capita. Others in the top seven are Hawaii, Idaho, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire and Vermont, according to the Safer Society Foundation.

Maloney represents the family of a 6-year-old boy raped by a fellow kindergartner. "He said 'Please, I'll be your best friend,'" the alleged victim said, according to a transcript of an interview with a police officer.

Experts say certain trends emerge among the cases of children charged with sex crimes against other children.

Many — estimates range from 40 percent to 80 percent — were molested themselves. And 42 percent have been exposed to hardcore pornography, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, an arm of the U.S. Department of Justice, said in a 2001 report.

Psychologists prefer to refer to juveniles charged with sex crimes as "sexually aggressive children," rather than as sex offenders.

Psychologist Heather Bowlds, who runs a sex offender treatment program within California's Department of Juvenile Justice, says sexually aggressive children often have a skewed sense of sexuality in which force or violence becomes normal.

"Some kids see it as how you show affection, how you get your needs met," she said. "If you're a kid watching your father rape your mother ... if I feel like I want it, I can get it, no matter what."

Labels: ,

11th Annual Arab Film festival is Coming

The 11th AnnualArab Film festival runs from October 18th to 28th at many locations throughout the Bay Area and November 2nd to 4th in Los Angeles. Watch for pre-festival screenings and other exciting events on our events page and make sure to signup for our mailing list.

Their Mission


The mission of the Arab Film Festival (AFF) is to enhance public understanding of Arab culture and to provide alternative representations of Arabs that contradict the stereotypical images frequently encountered in the American mass media. The Arab Film Festival screens films from and about the Arab World that provide realistic perspectives on Arab people, culture, art, history and politics. In 2005, AFF Inc. became an independent, tax-exempt [i.e. 501(c)3] organization. We hope that our new status will encourage new donors, which will help increase the reach of the festival within the San Francisco Bay Area.

Labels: ,

Iraqi trade union leaders reject U.S. occupation and new oil law


Visiting Iraqi trade union leaders reject U.S. occupation and new oil law

June 19, 2007


Two Iraqi trade union leaders on a speaking tour of the United States are calling for a rejection of the new oil law being considered in the Iraqi parliament. The law was secretly written in Houston in favor of the U.S. oil companies long before it was ever seen by any member of the Iraqi parliament. If passed, the new oil law would effectively turn over all new oil fields to the control of foreign oil companies.
Faleh Abood Umara, General Secretary of the Southern Oil Company Union (affiliated with the Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions) worked for the Southern Oil Company in Basra for 28 years. Umara was detained by Saddam Hussein’s regime in 1998 for union activities. In the post-Saddam years he has worked on his union’s negotiating team with both the Oil Ministry and British occupation authorities, defending the rights of oil company workers. His colleague Hashmeya Mushin Hussein, President of the Electrical Utility Workers Union, is the first woman to head a national union in Iraq. The Electrical Utility Workers are affiliated with the General Federation of Iraqi Workers (GFIW).

When asked what will happen if U.S. troops withdraw, Umara replied. Wherever U.S. forces are, the killing and carnage is more. Where they are not present, there is no suicide bombing. Both leaders clearly indicated that the U.S. occupation itself creates sectarian violence and reduces security.

On Sunday, June 10th, the two Iraqi trade union leaders from Basra spoke before an enthusiastic audience of approximately 125 people in the Laborers Hall in San Jose. On Tuesday June 12th, they spoke in San Francisco at an event co-sponsored by USLAW, United for Peace and Justice and the American Friends Service Committee. Organized by U.S. Labor Against the War, the South Bay AFL-CIO Labor Council, Laborers Local 270, South Bay Mobilization, and a score of other labor and peace organizations, the programs were part of a national speaking tour to help raise awareness about the conditions facing Iraqi workers.




Iraqi Unionists Speak Out Against U.S. Occupation and Privatization Schemes

June 18, 2007


Two Iraqi labor leaders spoke in San Francisco June 12 about the situation facing working people and unions in Iraq, the effects of the U.S. occupation, and prospects for ending the occupation.

The San Francisco Labor Council and U.S. Labor Against the War (USLAW) sponsored a breakfast meeting and evening presentation by Faleh Abood Umara, general secretary of the Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions and a representative of the Arab American Union Members Council, and Hashmeya Muhsin Hussein, president of the Iraqi Electrical Utility Workers Union and the first woman to lead a national union in Iraq. Other events were held around the Bay Area as part of the 26-day, 12-city Voices of Iraqi Workers Solidarity Tour sponsored by USLAW. Umara was also part of a USLAW-sponsored tour of the U.S. in 2005, along with two other Iraqi labor leaders.

“They showed the human face of the Iraqi people and brought a voice that wasn’t being heard in the U.S.,” said Michael Eisenscher, a co-founder of USLAW. During the 2005 tour, the Iraqis met with AFL-CIO leaders before the organization’s convention that passed a resolution calling for bringing U.S. troops home from Iraq.

“Bringing that delegation helped get the resolution passed,” Eisenscher said. “It was the first time the AFL-CIO voted to oppose the government in time of war and call for the rapid withdrawal of U.S. troops.” The AFL-CIO has continued to actively oppose the Iraq war and occupation. Eisenscher said that the organization’s Solidarity Center in Jordan helped bring the Iraqis to the U.S.

Eisenscher also reminded the audience that after the US invasion in March, 2003, troops were stationed at the Iraq Oil Ministry while the Museum of Antiquity was looted of priceless historical artifacts. “Iraqis could see we were there for their oil,” Eisenscher said. “Now they have an oil law written in Texas, not in Iraq.” He said the law would never be enacted because of the strong opposition by the Iraqi union leaders.

Faleh Abood Umara of the Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions (IFOU) spoke about the efforts to resist privatization of Iraq’s oil and why unions oppose the proposed oil investment law. His comments were translated by Essan Elmahgoop of Arabic Translation Services.

“Iraq has the greatest oil reserves in the world,” Umara said. “Mr. Bush wants to steal Iraq’s oil.” Umara said that the oil workers in Basra had kicked out the American subcontractor and Haliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown, and Root in the fall of 2003 and would continue to resist privatization.

“We refuse any contracts that don’t allow us to have a say in production,” he said. “To the ones who want to steal our oil we say it will only cause more bloodshed. The oil workers and other union members are willing to die for the cause.” Umara said he had just received word that after a week on strike, the oil workers had won a victory in Basra.

Members of the IFOU struck the pipeline company in Basra, bringing a stop to the free flow of oil products, including kerosene and gasoline in one pipeline. The pipe transfers oil and gas to Baghdad and the central region of the country. The workers are demanding an end to control of the pipeline from Baghdad because of mismanagement.

Umara said that the Iraqi government had ordered the arrest of ten union leaders but that the army leader in Basra had refused to arrest them. Umara said the strike was successful because of the support from port workers, teachers, railroad workers and other unions in Basra, which he said has the strongest union activity in Iraq.

He called for solidarity among Iraqi and American workers. “We have to work together to end the bloodshed that is happening daily in our country so that the American youth can return home,” Umara said. He added that he wanted to give George Bush some advice: “Leave Iraq and let us build our own country.”

Electrical Utility Workers Union president Hashmeya Muhsin Hussein said that “Bush named many reasons for the invasion of Iraq—to get rid of Saddam, to find weapons of mass destruction and to bring us democracy. Saddam is gone; there were no WMD and the democracy he brought was nothing but a sea of blood. We have entered a new dark age under the shadow of occupation.”

Ms. Hussein said that Iraqis who opposed Saddam’s regime wanted to get rid of it but, “We never wanted occupation. We never applauded the invasion or welcomed them with flowers. The occupation was imposed on us.” She said that most of the country’s problems were due to a deteriorating security situation. The country has suffered from sectarian violence and almost daily bombings, a rise in terrorism since 2004, a civilian death toll that could be as high as 650,000, and the exodus of over three million Iraqis from the country.

Emissions from armaments, including shells hardened with depleted uranium, have so polluted the environment that workers are beginning to get sick and many are suffering from terminal illnesses, Hussein said.

“Most simple services are lacking,” Hussein said. “There’s no electricity and prices are high. We are under pressure from the International Monetary Fund to pay the debts [from the Saddam Hussein regime].” She said that over 60 percent of Iraq’s workforce is unemployed, including many youth, and that nine million people live below the poverty line.

She said that U.S.-backed laws have taken away trade unions’ property and made it hard to join unions. The government also has not repealed laws enacted under the Saddam regime that prohibit public employees from joining unions.

“After four years of occupation, the situation is deteriorating. The government is spending billions of dollars to improve electrical service, saying next year will be better. Billions are wasted every year but it never improves,” Hussein said. She said electricity is only on for one hour, then off for six hours. “Other sectors are also deteriorating—including labs, factories, and steel and petrochemical production.”

“Iraq’s soil is rich in resources and we have the workforce,” Hussein added, “But the U.S. plan is to transform our economy to a so-called liberal economy through privatization.” Privatization has been supported by the U.S. State Department since before the invasion in 2003, and has the backing of the IMF. The opening up of Iraqi oil for “private investment” is one of the benchmarks in the Iraq funding bill, which the Democratic Party majority Congress passed and President Bush signed recently.

The U.S.-backed government has proposed a new law in Iraq that would permit what the oil industry calls “production-sharing agreements” that could put 70 percent of the profits from oil sales in the hands of rich oil companies and leave the Iraqi people with little to run their country.

Hussein pointed out that “In the agricultural sector, we have the two rivers and fertile land; but it is not producing. The only products sold in the markets are foreign goods.”

“Our visit here is to explain to you and the American public what is really happening in Iraq and that the American media is misleading you,” Ms. Hussein said. “We ask for your solidarity and support to see that the occupation forces leave our country.”

Ms. Muhsin Hussein also met with AFL-CIO President John Sweeney and addressed a group at the AFL-CIO in Washington. The San Francisco event was also sponsored by several Bay Area unions, as well as the Alameda and San Mateo Central Labor Councils.

USLAW is urging workers to write their members of Congress to support legislation that would:


• Not link military withdrawal from Iraq to adoption of the oil law;


• Demand that the Iraqi government and U.S. military authorities abide by recognized international labor standards, including the freedom to form unions;


• Remove all U.S. military forces from harm’s way by immediately withdrawing all troops and private contractors from Iraq; and


• Fully respect Iraq’s sovereignty.


For more information:


Paul Burton, with material from James Parks in Washington, D.C.: http://blog.aflcio.org/.

See also: Iraqi Workers Strike to Keep Their Oil: http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/06/13/iraqi-workers-strike-to-keep-their-oil/

Labels: ,