Saturday, July 8, 2006

Palestinians Ask for Cease-fire As Israel Says No Deal

Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh from Hamas, right, examines the damage to a Palestinian house after Israel forces withdrew from the area, in Beit Lahiya, in the northern Gaza Strip, Saturday, July 8, 2006. The Hamas government on Saturday called for a cease-fire to end its violent two-week standoff with Israel, but Israel rejected it because it stopped short of offering to release an Israeli soldier held by Hamas militants. Officials in the office of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said he would not agree to a truce until Hamas freed Cpl. Gilad Shalit, whose capture provoked Israel to invade the Gaza Strip and bombard it with artillery barrages and airstrikes. (AP Photo/Hatem Moussa)

Israel rejects Palestinian call for truce

Defense Sec. Rumsfeld cancels Israel visit due to Gaza fighting

July 8, 2006

By Aluf Benn, Haaretz Correspondent

U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has canceled a planned trip to Israel scheduled for next week.

Israeli government sources say the cancellation reflects Rumsfeld`s wish to distance himself from the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

Rumsfeld has never visited Israel while Defense Secretary.

The visit was intended to reinforce security relations between the United States and Israel, strained after a conflict erupted between the two governments over Israeli arms sales to China.

Rumsfeld was scheduled to meet Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Defense Minister Amir Peretz.

Two leading U.S. foreign policy officials are expected to visit Israel this week. David Welch, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, and Elliott Abrams, deputy national security adviser to President George W. Bush, will arrive in Jerusalem on Thursday for meetings with government officials.

Mother and two children killed in IAF strike in Gaza

IDF advances to within 500 meters of Gaza City


Defense Minister Amir Peretz speaks with IDF Chief of Staff Dan Halutz at a military base near Kibbutz Zikim. (Reuters)

July 8, 2006

By Avi Issacharoff, Amos Harel, Aluf Benn, Mijal Grinberg and Yuval Azoulay, Haaretz Correspondents, Haaretz Service and Agencies


six-year-old Palestinian girl, her elder brother and her mother were killed Saturday evening during an Israel Air Forces air strike on a house east of Gaza City, medical sources said.

The aerial attack came in the neighborhood of Sajaiyeh, near the Karni border crossing on Gaza's eastern border with Israel.

The Israel Defense Forces confirmed an airstrike in the area, saying it was aiming for a group of armed gunmen.

The IDF expanded its operation in Gaza on Saturday morning, with tanks advancing to within 500 meters of Gaza City. Some 15 tanks entered the Strip through the Karni border crossing in what the army said was a search for tunnels used by militants. Read more...

UNRWA: Help the Palestinians in Gaza

For someone not living in the Gaza Strip, daily life today is hard to imagine. Sonic booms shatter the night skies, making sleep all but impossible. Waking in the morning, mothers cannot prepare breakfasts, nor children shower and wash – there is so little water. Leaving home, children find the streets and alleys en route to schools strewn with sewage. Delivery of water and maintenance of sewage disposal is dependent upon electricity – a sporadic commodity these days. ...more

DEMO IN SAN FRANCISCO

July 13, 2006, at 4:30 pm

In a powerful demonstration of strength and self determination, over 700 Palestinians and their allies converged on the San Francisco israeli consulate and demanded an end to the siege of Gaza and the occupation of Palestine. For excerpts and photos from Indymedia go to http://www.indybay.org/international/palestine/

Al-Awda San Francisco is calling for another rally on July 13, 2006, at 4:30 pm, at the same location: the Consulate Of Israel, 456 Montgomery St. San Francisco.

The following day will be the opening of the 4th Annual Al Awda Convention at San Francisco State University. Join us:

Al-Awda Convention Announcement
July 14-16, 2006
San Francisco, CA

Jack Adams Hall
San Francisco State University
1600 Holloway Avenue,
San Francisco, CA 94132, USA

Friday, July 14th OPENING NIGHT Celebration --6pm

Registration begins at 4pm on Friday and 8:30am on Saturday

BUILDING THE RIGHT TO RETURN MOVEMENT

Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition, and the General Union of Palestine Students at SFSU are proud to announce the Fourth International Al-Awda Convention in San Francisco, CA. It will be a strategic planning conference focused on adapting to shifting realities and rising to meet the challenges of our era.

To send in your organizational endorsement, please email musa@al-awda.org

Further information

Make This a City of Peace

And remember Abraham said: "My Lord, make this a City of peace, and feed its people with fruits,-such of them as believe in Allah and the Last Day." He said: "(Yea), and such as reject Faith,-for a while will I grant them their pleasure, but will soon drive them to the torment of Fire,- an evil destination (indeed)!" ( سورة البقرة , Al-Baqara, Chapter 2:126)

وَإِذْ قَالَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ رَبِّ اجْعَلْ هَـَذَا بَلَداً آمِناً وَارْزُقْ أَهْلَهُ مِنَ الثَّمَرَاتِ مَنْ آمَنَ مِنْهُم بِاللّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الآخِرِ قَالَ وَمَن كَفَرَ فَأُمَتِّعُهُ قَلِيلاً ثُمَّ أَضْطَرُّهُ إِلَى عَذَابِ النَّارِ وَبِئْسَ الْمَصِيرُ

An Israeli Army Tank is Seen in Beit Lahiya

An Israeli army tank is seen in position during an incursion in Beit Lahiya, in the northern Gaza Strip, Friday, July 7, 2006. Israeli aircraft struck a group of Palestinians in the northern Gaza Strip on Friday, and witnesses said three people were killed.

Israeli aircraft struck gunmen in northern Gaza early Friday while ground troops backed by tanks pursued militants in the streets of crowded towns, bringing to 25 the number of Palestinians killed in the latest phase of Israel's military offensive in the coastal strip. (AP Photo/Hatem Moussa)

Will Israel Free Palestinian Prisoners?

Israel suggests release if soldier freed


Palestinian youths run to avoid Israeli sniper fire during an Israeli army incursion in Beit Lahiya, in the northen Gaza Strip, Friday July 7, 2006. At least twenty-four Palestinians and one Israeli soldier were killed in fighting that broke out in the Gaza Strip after Israeli tanks and troops, backed by aircraft, seized control of a ribbon of land in the northern part of Gaza in an attempt to win freedom for a captured soldier and put Israel out of the militants' increasingly longer rocket range. (AP Photo/David Guttenfelder)

July 7, 2006

By SARAH EL DEEB, Associated Press Writer

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip -Two weeks into Israel's violent standoff with Hamas, Israel sent conflicting signals Friday on whether it is prepared to swap Palestinian prisoners for a soldier whose capture by Palestinian militants has touched off a harsh military campaign.

Israeli troops killed 32 Palestinians in two days of air strikes and artillery barrages, Palestinian officials said. The campaign is aimed at stopping rocket attacks on Israel and pressuring the ruling Hamas movement to release the kidnapped soldier, Cpl. Gilad Shalit.

Israel's public security minister, Avi Dichter, suggested Friday that Israel is ready to cut a deal that would fall short of a direct prisoner swap.

Dichter said Israel could free some Palestinian prisoners as a goodwill gesture after Shalit is released and Hamas stops rocket attacks on Israel.

If there is calm, "Israel will need to, after some time, release prisoners as a reciprocal gesture," Dichter said. "Israel knows how to do this. Israel has done this more than once in the past."

He was referring to previous prisoner swaps — usually in deals that freed far more Palestinians than Israelis. Privately, Israeli officials have said they did not rule out talks in Shalit's case, either.

Moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said he has won Israeli assurances that it would reciprocate for Shalit's release by freeing some prisoners, as well as Hamas politicians it has rounded up in recent days.

Officials close to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert later said Dichter's statement did not reflect the views of the government and that Israel insists on the soldier's unconditional release. However, the government did not issue a formal statement distancing itself from the minister.

Israel does not want to be seen as cutting a deal with Hamas militants, but also does not seem to have a way to free the soldier by force.

Hamas said Friday that Shalit, seized June 25, is alive and being treated well. It also urged Israel to negotiate. The Islamic militant group initially demanded the release of hundreds of prisoners, but then scaled back its demands, seeking freedom for some 150 female inmates and several dozen men serving long sentences.

The internal Israeli debate came as ground troops backed by tanks pursued militants in the streets of crowded Gaza towns, and aircraft struck northern Gaza.

Shalit is believed to be held in southern Gaza, and days after he was seized, Israel launched its biggest military campaign in the coastal strip since ending its 38-year occupation there nine months ago.

The incursion began in southern Gaza, then expanded Thursday to the north as troops seized control of a ribbon of land. On Friday, Israeli aircraft struck Palestinian gunmen in northern Gaza.

Palestinian health officials said a total of 32 Palestinians were killed over two days, including 24 on Thursday, in the bloodiest day of clashes since the renewed fighting began last week. An 11-year-old boy shot in the chest during fighting on Wednesday died of his wounds late Friday, Palestinian hospital officials said.

Egyptian mediators have proposed a two-stage deal in which Hamas would free Shalit and halt rocket attacks. In exchange, Israel would halt its offensive and promise to free some Palestinian prisoners in the future.

A Palestinian official close to the negotiations said Israel has agreed to the Egyptian formula, but wants the deal to be confidential, to avoid the impression of a direct prisoner exchange. Hamas wants the terms of the deal to be announced publicly, he said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the talks are confidential.

Israeli Cabinet minister Roni Bar-On, who is close to Olmert, said Israel would not negotiate with Hamas over the release of prisoners. However, his comment did not appear to contradict Dichter who also did not call for direct contact with the militants.

The fighting has compounded the misery that has deepened in Gaza and the West Bank since Hamas took power in March. International sanctions imposed to pressure the group to recognize Israel have rendered it unable to pay government salaries, but on Friday, Palestinian officials said about one-fifth of the 165,000 civil servants would receive a small down payment.

Government employees sustain about one-third of the Palestinians. Small down payments have been paid twice before.

Iraq Solider is tackled on Florida Fight as He Goes Wild on Plane

Official: Passengers tackle Iraq vet ramming cockpit door

July 7, 2006

TAMPA, Florida (AP) -- A U.S. Army soldier who had served in Iraq was tackled by airplane passengers after he ran down the aisle and rammed the cockpit door on a flight from New York to Tampa, an official said.

The soldier did not have any weapons and there was no evidence that he meant harm anyone on the flight Thursday night, Tampa International Airport spokeswoman Brenda Geoghagan said.

She said he was restrained until the flight landed, then taken into custody under a Florida law that allows a person to be held without charges if they are deemed to be a threat to themselves or others.

The soldier's brother told officials that he "has some mental problems related to his Army service," Geoghagan said. The brothers were traveling from New York to visit their mother in Tampa.

Army spokesman Sheldon Smith said the man was attached to Fort Riley, Kansas, but his status was unclear.

An incident report said the man was scheduled to get out of the service July 12 and was on leave.

No charges had been filed Friday morning.

Helicopter reportedly shot down near Baghdad



July 06, 2006

Video

The Iraqi resistance group, Jaish al-Mujahedeen, released a video on the internet today showing, what they claim, is the downing of an American Apache helicopter northwest of Baghdad. The resistance group released no other information with the video and its authenticity has not been verified by US or Iraqi officials.

Two US soldiers died May 14 when their helicopter was shot down near Yusifiya, 15 km (9 miles) south of Baghdad. On April 1, two Apache Longbow pilots died when their aircraft was shot down near Baghdad.

A subsequent video released by the Mujahedeen Shura Council showed the aftermath of what appeared to be a helicopter crash. American officials had cast doubt on the authenticity of the April video.

Israeli's Bloodlust Grows with Poll Results

Most Israelis want Hamas leaders assassinated - poll

8 July 2006

JERUSALEM: The vast majority of Israelis believe the Jewish state should assassinate leaders of the governing Palestinian movement Hamas in response to the crisis in Gaza, a newspaper poll showed.

The survey in the Maariv daily showed 82 per cent of Israelis favoured killing leaders of the Islamic militant group, whom Israel holds responsible for the abduction of a soldier on June 25 in a cross-border raid from Gaza and recent rocket attacks.

Respondents were questioned on Wednesday, the day before Israeli tanks and troops pushed into northern Gaza, taking over areas Israel abandoned last year after 38 years of occupation.

The offensive aims to bring home Corporal Gilad Shalit and halt militant rocket fire into the Jewish state from Gaza.

Israel has hinted it might assassinate Hamas leaders unless Shalit is freed. In a clear warning, an Israeli helicopter gunship wrecked the empty Gaza office of Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas a few hours before dawn on Sunday.

Hamas, which is sworn to destroy Israel, took over the Palestinian government in March after winning January elections. It is already reeling under a Western aid embargo imposed because it refuses to recognise the Jewish state and disarm.

The poll showed 47 percent of respondents were unhappy with the overall performance of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, compared to 43 per cent who gave a positive review. There were no comparisons from previous polls.

New Defence Minister Amir Peretz's approval rating was low, with only 28 per cent of respondents saying he was doing a good job, while 64 percent said he was not.

Zionism's doom

July 7, 2006

Al-Ahram Weekly

Israel had been waiting for a pretext to unleash its venom against the people, resistance, and Palestinian Authority (PA) in Gaza and the West Bank. The capture of an Israeli occupation soldier offered its convenient cover to wage yet another of its pre- meditated campaigns of aggression, exactly as it often did in the past. Israel used Egypt's closure of the Straits of Tiran in 1967 to wage a full-scale war against its neighbours. It used the assassination of the Israeli ambassador in London in 1982 to invade Lebanon. And it used the case of Ahmad Saadat and Fouad Al-Shobki to lay siege on Yasser Arafat's headquarters in 2002.

Since Ariel Sharon's time, Israel has been determined to disengage unilaterally from the Palestinians and liquidate the resistance. And since Hamas came to power, Israel has been waiting for the right moment to bring down the Palestinian government. This is what the current confrontation is all about.

Israel wants to liquidate the Palestinian issue and put an end to Palestinian patriotism. It wants the Palestinians to accept self-rule in the areas left after Israel carves off large chunks of the West Bank and Gaza, in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 242. Israel doesn't want to hear the Palestinians talking about Jerusalem, the right of refugees to return to their homes, and a sovereign state on all land occupied in 1967. In brief, Israel doesn't want to hear about Palestinian national rights.

To get what it wants, Israel took to claiming that no Palestinian partner existed for negotiations. This claim is Israel's way of turning its back on international obligations, on Resolution 242, the Madrid Conference, the Oslo Accords, and the Roadmap. Three years ago, Israel made up its mind. It started building the apartheid wall in the occupied territories and then proceeded to pull out unilaterally from Gaza. The withdrawal from Gaza was a litmus test. Israel wanted to see how the world would react.

Israel soon discovered that its political scheme has the explicit support of the Americans and the implicit backing of the Europeans. But to implement that scheme, Israel would have first to quash the resistance and crush Palestinian human and combat capabilities. Israel learned a lesson from its withdrawal from Gaza. It learned that withdrawal and disengagement alone will not silence the Palestinians. The resistance kept showering Israel with rockets and even carried out operations inside Israel's 1948 borders. This is why Israel decided to go after the resistance. The capture of the Israeli soldier was just an excuse.

Israel wants to dismantle the Palestinian Authority because it needs to tell the world that the Palestinians have no one to speak on their behalf. This has been the Israeli line since the siege of President Arafat. Israel boycotted Arafat during his life and has not engaged his successor in serious talks. When Hamas came to power, Israel decided to act.

Although it knew that the Americans and Europeans didn't like Hamas either, Israel waited for months to act against the movement. The reason Israel waited is that it was hoping Hamas and Fatah would turn on one another and spare it the task of bringing them both down. Yet Israel's hopes for a full-fledged civil war were dashed once the factions agreed on a document for national consensus. Palestinian common sense has triumphed, and thus deprived the Israelis of the spectacle of domestic strife they'd been hoping for. It is no coincidence that the Israelis attacked as soon as the document was signed. Once the Palestinians were acting as one again, the Israelis had no option but to send in the tanks.

Israel is fighting the resistance. It is fighting the PA. And it is fighting the Palestinian people who brought the government and PA to power. Israel is taking ministers and parliamentarians, as well as heads of municipalities, into custody. This is all a part of its collective punishment of the Palestinians, matched only by its bombardment of bridges and power plants. What Israel forgets is that you cannot bomb a people into submission, and that moral right is ultimately stronger than the executioner's menace.

Funeral For 19 Year Old Palestinian Youth by IDF


Relatives mourn during the funeral of Abu Salah al Dara, who was killed in his car on Thursday by an Israeli air strike, in Gaza city July 7, 2006. (Ahmed Jadallah/Reuters)


The young man was killed, while watching a skirmish between IDF and Palestinian resistance, Thursday.

Funerals don't deter Gaza youth

____________

Another bloody day Thursday as 24 Palestinian resistance fighters lost their lives in intensified clashes and air-strikes with IDF.

Fighting in Gaza escalates

Militants engage in fight of their lives

Italy Condemns Israeli Operation in Gaza

July 7, 2006

Arutz Sheva

Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D’Alema released a statement condemning the ongoing IDF counter-terror operation in Gaza, accusing Israel of using unjustifiable military might in the Palestinian Authority (PA) autonomous area.

“No one can imagine that in order to save one hostage it is permissible to launch an operation that will lead to the deaths of tens of people,” stated the minister.

Israeli Anti-tank Rocket Hits PA Home as Palestinian Deaths Mount

July 7, 2006

by Housewife4Palestine

Mentioned at Artuz Sheva online an anti-tank rocket fired at Israeli soldiers in Atatrah area in Northern Gaza on Friday morning hit the home of Palestinian Authority(PA) residents instead of hitting any Israeli military personal.

If any Palestinians injured from this attack, is not known at this time.

It should also be brought to attention; the death toll to the Palestinians at the hands of the Israeli’s is growing.

While it is being so pointy noted, how many Israel’s were not harmed during these incursion's; the lost of life to the Palestinians is becoming epidemic in proportions.

Palestinian Authority Interior Ministry: Attack IDF Forces

July 7, 2006

Arutz Sheva

The Palestinian Authority has officially ordered its forces to attack IDF troops. It was the first time that the PA government has formally told its forces to fire at IDF soldiers.

PA Interior Minister Said Siam gave orders to the government’s security personnel to attack IDF forces in Gaza.

Friday, July 7, 2006

Death Grows as Israel Scavengers their Way across Northern Gaza

As the Lies Stay the Same?
An injured Palestinian man is brought to the Kamal Edwan hospital, following a helicopter missile attack by Israeli forces in Beit Lahiya in the northern Gaza Strip. Twenty-two Palestinians and an Israeli soldier were killed as Israel thrust deep into the Gaza Strip, reoccupying areas evacuated 10 months ago and carrying out a wave of air raids.(AFP/Mohammed Abed)

23 killed as Israel invades northern Gaza

Thursday, July 6, 2006

Gaza militants pledge bloody fight with Israel

Gaza militants pledge bloody fight with Israel
Palestinian militants take cover during a gun battle in Beit Lahiya, Gaza Strip July 6, 2006. (Oleg Popov/Reuters)


July 6, 2006

By Luke Baker


ATATRAH, Gaza (Reuters) - Palestinian militants battling Israeli troops in the streets of northern Gaza threatened a long and bloody campaign on Thursday as Israeli forces pushed deeper into the coastal strip.

"We are ready to fight for as long as it takes and die as martyrs," said a bearded, 25-year-old fighter who gave his name as Abu al-Bara, taking a break from the clashes with Israeli troops, who were sent into northern Gaza to curb rocket fire.

Abu al-Bara said many young men had joined his group, a small faction that is part of the Popular Resistance Committees, and suicide bombers were preparing to carry out attacks.
"We are Muslims, our God will protect us," he said, crouching in an alleyway off the streets of Atatrah with two other uniformed fighters as Israeli helicopters flew above.


At least two militants were killed in Atatrah on Thursday and several others injured, including an armed man who dashed into a house that was hit moments later by a missile fired from an Israeli drone.

A total of 12 Palestinians were killed in the fighting on Thursday. Doctors said at least 8 of them were civilians.

The thud of machine-gun fire echoed across the neighborhood as Israeli troops moved to solidify their hold on ground around three settlements in northern Gaza that they quit last year and parts of the adjacent town of Beit Lahiya.

The operation is designed to stop militants firing rockets into Israel and part of a larger move to rescue an Israeli soldier who was captured by militants nearly two weeks ago.

Around 50 Palestinian fighters, some armed with rocket-propelled grenades and others with assault rifles, could be seen maneuvering through the narrow backstreets of Atatrah as they edged away from Israeli forces.

Some were dressed in black uniforms with baseball caps showing their affiliation, others wore green camouflage trousers with matching bullet-proof vests. Others were in jeans and t-shirts and some were masked.

Followers of three factions -- the Islamist group Hamas, the Fatah movement and the Popular Resistance Committees -- provide the bulk of the fighters, but there are other, smaller factions involved, too, those fighting said.

At the same time, they were quick to point out that there were no ideological differences between them, even though only two weeks ago, before the Israeli soldier, 19-year-old Gilad Shalit, was captured, they were at loggerheads.

"The factions are all together now," said Abu Nameer, another fighter in Atatrah. "We fight as one fist."

Complicating Israel's ability to battle the militants is the fact they are hiding out in civilian areas and are frequently surrounded by gangs of curious boys keen to watch the clashes.

In an effort to try to stem any deeper Israeli advance into Atatrah and Beit Lahiya, militants laid explosives by roadsides on Thursday, covering the detonation wire with sand. Boys were employed to make sure the wire was constantly covered.

Indictment USA

Incarceration upon my own
Right here in G’tmo Bay,
Brings to mind a distant home
Far, far, far away…

But temperaments begin to sour
Upon this doleful day,
Reflecting on the ‘super-power’
Known as the USA.

Examining this mystery,
And its status as today,
Begins the sordid history
Of an early USA:

PART 1

The ‘Fathers Pilgrim’ sailed the brine
Aboard the ‘Flower of May’,
And Anchored in the fateful sign
Of a covetous USA (1)

Achieving an independence,
Through hard won battle-play,
They focused on the presence
Of the native USA (2)

The receptive Indian nations
Were fought and held at bay
In exclusive ‘reservations’
At the hotel USA (3)

The irony is ‘Thanksgiving’
As a national holiday!
That not a native living
Observes in the USA (4)

The nation chants, “…home of the brave”,
But remind them, if one may,
It really was home of the slave
To the darker USA

It caused a brutal civil war,
Though some would otherwise say;
A vibrant, living racist core
Still breeds in the USA

An impassioned vocal adversary
Of a nation gone astray,
Did “By any means necessary…”
Chastise the USA (5)

Another said, “I have a dream…” (6)
But they soon blew him away;
And hopes of a racially utopian scene
In the ghettos of the USA

Freedom was stolen, along with title,
From Mohammad Ali (Clay);
Rejecting war he made a revival
That stunned the USA


PART 2

Through a relatively short existence
The chronicles betray
An impertinent persistence
Of a meddlesome USA:

The quest for mass destructive-arms
Recalls ‘Enola Gay’; (7)
Her genocidal atomic charms
Were Made in the USA

Blameless Japanese Americans
(Referred to as ‘Nisei’),
Were thrown into internments
By a paranoid USA (8)

The Korean War evinced no gain,
Except a mighty fray,
And arousal of a new disdain
For an intrusive USA (9)

Insurgent Cuban fighters
At the ‘Pigs’ entitled Bay,
Were routed, since inciters
Were a prudent USA (10)

Napalm’, ‘My Lai’ (11) – Vietnam
Speak messages that convey
The massacres by Uncle Sam
In the name of the USA

An abortive hostage rescue attempt, (12)
Becoming of the Green Berét,
The Iranians regarded with contempt
And derision of the USA

Over ten score on an airbus tour
Killed by a missile ‘stray’,
Were targets sure for the Naval Corps
And a hit for the USA! (13)

Grenada created many fears, (14)
Within their hearts’ inlay:
With bows and arrows (and some spears)
That scared the USA!

In Somalia, with Black Hawk aid,
They augmented decay
When thousands died as bullets sprayed
By a charitable USA (15)

Attacks on a Sudanese hospital (16)
Earned them a scathing flay,
As another destitute capital
Fell victim to the USA

In a Persian War they chose to ignore
Where millions in coffins lay,
The dictator with a chemical store
Was funded by the USA (17)

Kuwait was invaded – like Palestine –
But freed without delay;
For abundant crude-oil to refine
As fuel for the USA

Rounds of depleted uranium
Did little to allay
Ill-effects on the cranium
Of the soldier USA

The debacle staged in Iraq
Is a protracted replay
Of a tendency to overact
By the players: USA

Naked prisoners on parade
In pyramid-like array,
Served the purpose to degrade
A shameless USA (18)

As bombs fell on Afghanistan
The innocent had to pay
The price – in this impoverished land –
For the nemesis USA:

The man was sought in a mountain resort,
Like a needle in a stack of hay;
But if he’s caught is there much thought
Of a peaceful USA?

Re-imposing their idea:
“By force, we’ll have our way…”
Iran is placed, just like Korea,
In the sights of the USA

But wavering allies – one by one –
Resign without essay,
Provoking the opinion
To desert the USA

Redolent with a Yankee stench,
The world is caused dismay;
Many more – like the dainty
French Despise the USA

Part 3

Many a distant mile they’ve flown
To injuries ‘repay’,
Neglecting to look at their own
Deep in the USA:

Rioting youths and police brutality
In South Central L.A.,
Are naked truths to a harsh reality
On the streets of the USA

Juvenile shootings in Columbine (19)
Quite suitably portray
A zone of combat and frontline
In the heart of the USA

Firearms and ballistics,
As promoted by the NRA (20)
Embody the characteristics

Of a gun-toting USA

Gangsters, snipers and drug-dealers
Buy weapons on display;
Perverts, rapists and serial killers
All thrive in the USA

A peerless figure for homicide –
On a global-scale survey –
Is clearly a source of national pride
For the criminal USA (21)

Intelligence oxymoron,
In the ‘Bureau’ and the CIA
Revealed impotence, hence ‘the War on
Terror’ by the USA

The globe is scoured for terrorists,
To halt and catch and slay,
But on closer analysis
They flourish in the USA:

Militias training to produce
A Timothy McVeigh, (22)
Continue this day to induce
An explosive USA

Doomsday cults and ‘Una-bombers’ (23)
Form much of the outlay,
For those entrusted with the honours
To preside the USA

The inane Texan, George .W. Bush,
Has begun to lose his sway,
Requiring but a gentle push
Off the map of the USA

An attitude stern with national concern
Is depicted to outweigh
The perpetual yearn for investment return
By the leader of the USA

“Regional stability” and “foreign aid”
Are an overstated cliché;
But exploitation of the oil trade
Are his goals for the USA

A dark cloud rising overhead
Evicts the blue to grey;
Rearing forth its gruesome head:
The repulsive USA

Throughout the world
The masses cry, “Depart” and “Go away”;
The banners scream emotions high,
“DOWN WITH THE USA!”

Epilogue

And on a rented Cuban patch
The abductees all pray
For justice, and a safe detach
From the clutches of the USA

(They suffered an atrocity
And want us all to pay,
But I want no proximity
To such a USA)

Never, till captivity,
Could I such words relay;
I regard it an epitome
Of the current USA

Vulgarity is not my style,
But still I have to say,
This occasion causes me revile
So **** the USA!

by Moazzam Begg

___________

Notes

1. In reference to the Pilgrim Fathers that sailed across from Europe to America on the Mayflower.
2. The politically correct term for the indigenous aboriginal people of America is now ‘Native American’, in contrast to Red ‘Indian’. The latter description was used erroneously by the first Europeans, thinking they had in fact found a Western passage to India. The term remains in wide use to this day.
3. Initially welcomed by the Natives the descendents of the Pilgrim Fathers began a campaign to seize territory. The natives made momentous stands with names like: Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse, Geronimo; the resistance by the tribes of Sioux, Apache, Cheyenne, Comanche, Blackfoot; the battles of Little Big Horn, Wounded Knee and the Trail of Tears (to the Black Hills of South Dakota) resounding throughout their ill-fated history. Eventually they were relegated to reside in ‘reservations’ - lands exclusively set aside for them. These were mostly barren wastelands or mountainous regions that had been rejected by US government.
4. When Francis Scott Key penned the national anthem from inside a British prison on the East Coast, he must have envisaged a country free from repression – unless you were black!
5. Referring to El Hajj Malik al-Shabazz - popularly known as Malcom X; assassinated in the 1960s
6. From the famous speech of Dr.Maritn Luther King; assassinated in the 1960s
7. The name of the American aeroplane that dropped the atomic bombs on the islands of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, educing the Japanese surrender in 1945.
8. In reference to the notorious (and constitutionally declared illegal) internment camps into which hundreds of thousands of Japanese men, women and children were thrown, after the Japanese air raids on Pearl Harbour, Hawaii, 1942.
9. With no clear winner after years of war between the Western backed ROK and the Chinese backed North, during the 195?, a line was drawn at the 38th parallel to demarcate the separation of the two Koreas.
10. In 196? at the last hour, insurgents trained and supported by the USA to mount a counter revolution against Fidel Castro’s forces, were deserted by JFK’s USA. The decision was a prudent one, considering the terror faced soon after with the Cuban Missile Crises.
11. In reference to the notorious massacre of villagers – mostly old men, women and children – perpetrated by US Forces during the height of the Vietnam War.
12. Refers to the botched rescue attempt staged by US Special forces, when attack helicopters fell foul of sand storms during an attempt to rescue American hostages, after they were seized at the US embassy in Tehran by Iranian students, during the revolution of 1979.
13. A civilian Iranian airbus, en route from Dubai to Iran, was shot down in 198? over the Persian Gulf by the US Navy as a “mistake”. The death toll was over 200.
14. When the USA invaded Grenada in 198?, they were ridiculed by much of the world community for sending in a hi-tech, mechanised force against badly armed opponents – many of whom were armed with nothing more advanced than bows and arrows!
15. The USA was putatively part of a United Nations mission to alleviate the suffering of the Somali people. Their mission – Operation Restore Hope – soon mutated into all out war, particularly on the ‘Day of the Rangers’, as the Somalis call it: the engagement dramatised in the film “Black Hawk Down” - in which 19 US soldiers and over 1000 Somalis were killed in one day.

16. The al-Shifa Medical centre and pharmaceutical manufacturers was found to have no tangible link to al-Qaida’s attacks against US embassies in Nairobi and Dar-us-Salaam. That small fact did not prevent the USA from striking it with Tomahawk Cruise missiles.
17. An obvious reference to Saddam Hussain, when he had the full blessing of the USA in his internecine war with Islamic Revolutionary Iran, over the possession of the Shatt al-‘Arab river. At that time Iran was regarded as the international pariah by the USA, and so Saddam’s use of chemical weapons was conveniently overlooked.
18. In reference to the Abu Ghraib atrocities perpetrated by US Forces in Iraq.
19. The schoolboy killings in Columbine College left ?? dead, including the perpetrators.
20. The National Rifle Association (headed by the actor Charlton Heston) is one of the most powerful lobbies in US politics. It campaigns tirelessly for the American citizen’s “right to bear arms”.
21. Statistics show that the USA is plagued with some of the highest crime rates in the world – homicide being top of the list, sardonically, and particularly in Washington D.C.
22. The man charged and convicted and executed for the Oklahoma City bombing in 1996. He is known to have been an active and trained member of the Michigan State Militia.
23. Cult leader David Koresh (who claimed to be Christ) and his followers were killed in a shoot out, following a protracted siege at Wako in Texas,1993; and the ‘Unabomber’ who bombed universities and medical research centres that experimented on live on animals.

Bloodiest Day,12 Palestinians Killed by Israeli’s


Palestinians carry the body of a badly wounded young armed Palestinian after an Israeli strike in the village of Abasan, next to the southern Gaza Strip town of Khan Younis Thursday, July 6, 2006. An Israeli strike hit a group of Palestinians, killing two people and wounding several others. The army said it had carried out an airstrike in the area against militants. (AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti)

Israelis advance; 12 Palestinians killed

Rosa Brooks: Did Bush commit war crimes?
















Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld could expose officials to prosecution.

June 30, 2006

THE SUPREME Court on Thursday dealt the Bush administration a stinging rebuke, declaring in Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld that military commissions for trying terrorist suspects violate both U.S. military law and the Geneva Convention.

But the real blockbuster in the Hamdan decision is the court's holding that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention applies to the conflict with Al Qaeda — a holding that makes high-ranking Bush administration officials potentially subject to prosecution under the federal War Crimes Act.

The provisions of the Geneva Convention were intended to protect noncombatants — including prisoners — in times of armed conflict. But as the administration has repeatedly noted, most of these protections apply only to conflicts between states. Because Al Qaeda is not a state, the administration argued that the Geneva Convention didn't apply to the war on terror. These assertions gave the administration's arguments about the legal framework for fighting terrorism a through-the-looking-glass quality. On the one hand, the administration argued that the struggle against terrorism was a war, subject only to the law of war, not U.S. criminal or constitutional law. On the other hand, the administration said the Geneva Convention didn't apply to the war with Al Qaeda, which put the war on terror in an anything-goes legal limbo.

This novel theory served as the administration's legal cover for a wide range of questionable tactics, ranging from the Guantanamo military tribunals to administration efforts to hold even U.S. citizens indefinitely without counsel, charge or trial.

Perhaps most troubling, it allowed the administration to claim that detained terrorism suspects could be subjected to interrogation techniques that constitute torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment under international law, such as "waterboarding," placing prisoners in painful physical positions, sexual humiliation and extreme sleep deprivation.

Under Bush administration logic, these tactics were not illegal under U.S. law because U.S. law was trumped by the law of war, and they weren't illegal under the law of war either, because Geneva Convention prohibitions on torture and cruel treatment were not applicable to the conflict with Al Qaeda.

In 2005, Congress angered the administration by passing Sen. John McCain's amendment explicitly prohibiting the use of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of detainees. But Congress did not attach criminal penalties to violations of the amendment, and the administration has repeatedly indicated its intent to ignore it.

The Hamdan decision may change a few minds within the administration. Although the decision's practical effect on the military tribunals is unclear — the administration may be able to gain explicit congressional authorization for the tribunals, or it may be able to modify them to comply with the laws of war — the court's declaration that Common Article 3 applies to the war on terror is of enormous significance. Ultimately, it could pave the way for war crimes prosecutions of those responsible for abusing detainees.

Common Article 3 forbids "cruel treatment and torture [and] outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment." The provision's language is sweeping enough to prohibit many of the interrogation techniques approved by the Bush administration. That's why the administration had argued that Common Article 3 did not apply to the war on terror, even though legal experts have long concluded that it was intended to provide minimum rights guarantees for all conflicts not otherwise covered by the Geneva Convention.

But here's where the rubber really hits the road. Under federal criminal law, anyone who "commits a war crime … shall be fined … or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death." And a war crime is defined as "any conduct … which constitutes a violation of Common Article 3 of the international conventions signed at Geneva." In other words, with the Hamdan decision, U.S. officials found to be responsible for subjecting war on terror detainees to torture, cruel treatment or other "outrages upon personal dignity" could face prison or even the death penalty.

Don't expect that to happen anytime soon, of course. For prosecutions to occur, some federal prosecutor would have to issue an indictment. And in the Justice Department of Atty. Gen. Alberto Gonzales — who famously called the Geneva Convention "quaint" — a genuine investigation into administration violations of the War Crimes Act just ain't gonna happen.

But as Yale law professor Jack Balkin concludes, it's starting to look as if the Geneva Convention "is not so quaint after all."

Francis Boyle: Oil, Dollar Hegemony and Islam

Remember that before Bush invaded Iraq, President Putin of Russia said that if he invades Iraq he could set off World War Three.

A transcript of Professor Francis Boyle’s speech at the recent Perdana Global Peace Forum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Speaking on the neo-conservatives’ middle-east agenda, the Professor gave sobering predictions on a likely scenario for the Middle East and for Muslims all around the world.

Perdana Global Peace Forum
Special Session
2006 June 22nd, 2006
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

By Prof. Francis A. Boyle

Assalamu'alaikum. Dr. Mahathir, Mrs. Mahathir, distinguished Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Little has changed in the imperialist tendencies of American foreign policy since the founding of the United States of America in seventeen eighty-nine. The fledgling United States opened the nineteenth century by stealing the continent of North America from the Indians, while in the process ethnically cleansing them and then finally deporting the pitiful few survivors by means of death marches (a la Bataan) to Bantustans, which in America we call reservations, as in instance of America's manifest destiny to rule the world.

Then, the imperial government of the United States opened the twentieth century by stealing a colonial empire from Spain - in Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines, then inflicting a near-genocidal war against the Filipino people. While at the same time, purporting to annex, the kingdom of Hawaii and subjecting the native Hawaiian people to near-genocidal conditions from which they still suffer today- all in the name of securing America's so-called place in the sun.

And today at the dawn of the twenty first century, the world witnesses the effort by the imperial government of the United States of America to steal a hydrocarbon empire from the Muslim states and peoples, surrounding central Asia and the Persian Gulf under the pretext of fighting a war against international terrorism or eliminating weapons of mass destruction or promoting democracy which is total nonsense.

For the past two hundred and sixteen years, the imperialist foreign policy of the United States of America since its foundation, has been predicated upon racism, aggression, genocide, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity, war crimes and outright genocide. At the dawn of the third millennium of humankind’s parlous existence, nothing has changed about the operational dynamics of American imperial policy. And we see this today in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine and what appears to be an illegal attack upon Iran.

Now the topic today is the Middle East Agenda: Oil, Dollar Hegemony and Islam. So, I'm only going to limit my comments to that subject. We have to begin the story with the Arab oil embargo in nineteen seventy-three. As you know in nineteen sixty-seven, Israel launched an illegal and preventive war against the surrounding Arab states, stole the land and ethnically cleansed the people. But eventually Egypt offered a Peace Treaty to Israel which Israel rejected and the Egyptians and the Arab states decided then to use force to recover their lands.

Israel almost collapsed, the United States and Europe came to their support by providing weapons and in reaction the Arab states imposed an oil embargo on the United States and Europe, and brought their economies to their knees. Whereupon, the then U.S Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger threatened them and said, this will never happen again, and if you do, we will prevent it. And it was not just a threat. The United States government then at that time, planned, prepared and conspired, to steal the oil of the Persian Gulf. They did not have the military capability to do this at that time, to carry out the Kissinger threat, which was also then repeated by the Ford administration, and the Carter administration under Harold Brown and Brzezinski.

So they put into planning an interventionary force, designed expressly for the purpose of stealing Arab oil fields, and that was called the rapid deployment force. And it took ten years of training, planning, positioning, and supply to build that interventionary force of that capability and eventually it was called the U.S. Central Command. The purpose of the U.S. Central Command is to steal and control and dominate the oil and gas resources of the Persian Gulf and Central Asia. And that's exactly what the U.S. Central Command proceeded to do in the Bush Sr. war against Iraq, their first military expedition.

And as we know, that war exterminated probably two hundred thousand Iraqis. Half of them innocent civilians. Simply wiped out in a bombing campaign and a military expedition of unprecedented dimensions. But remember, it took fifteen years for the Pentagon and three different administrations both Republicans and Democrats to get the capability to do this. And then, when that genocide or conflict was over, what happened? The United States carved Iraq up into three pieces with their air force, the so-called no-fly zones, a zone for the Kurds in the North, a zone for the Shi'ah in the South, and the Sunni in the middle. Why? To destroy Iraq as an effectively viable state.

In his book, Clash of Civilizations, Huntington from Harvard who advised the Pentagon and advised the state department pointed out that the only Arab state with the capability to lead the Arab world and challenge the United States and Israel was Iraq. And so Iraq had to be destroyed, to maintain the domination of the United States and its proxy, Israel. And remember after nineteen seventy-three, whatever it was before then, Israel is nothing more than a catspaw of the United States. They do what America tells them to do. Otherwise Israel is nothing more than a failed state.

In addition then, to destroying Iraq as a state, carving it up into three pieces, was the decision to debilitate and destroy the Iraqi people. And so they continued the genocidal economic sanctions on the people of Iraq, that my colleagues, Denis Halliday, Hans Von Sponeck, so courageously resisted and finally resigned as a matter of principle, calling them by what they really were, genocide. The United States and Britain maliciously and criminally imposed genocidal sanctions on the people of Iraq, that killed approximately 1.5 million Iraqis, all of whom were innocent civilians.

And when U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was asked about the five hundred thousand dead children (per month), she said that she thought the price was worth it. Now, I could have taken that statement to the International Court of Justice, and filed it against the United States as evidence of genocidal intent against the people of Iraq in violation of the 1948 Genocide Convention. And indeed I offered to do so to the then President of Iraq, but for whatever reasons he decided not to take these claims to the International Court of Justice.

And now, as you see, he is on trial in a total kangaroo court proceeding in Baghdad that is completely controlled and dominated by the United States government. So, 1.5 million Iraqis died as the result of these genocidal sanctions. And then came September 11. And we know for a fact that the Bush Jr. administration knew that a major terrorist attack was going to be launched on the United States. And they let it happen anyway deliberately and on purpose. Why? They wanted a pretext for war. And not just one war but for a long war which they are talking about today.

Indeed, from my research the war plans drawn up by the Pentagon for the war against Afghanistan were formulated as early as 1997. Enormous military forces fielded by that same U.S. Central Command, were already in and around and surrounding the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean before September 11. This war had been planned against Afghanistan. And armed, equipped, supplied, trained and war-gamed and ready to go. They just needed the pretext and that was September 11. Why? The United States wanted access to the oil and natural gas of Central Asia.

That had been a Pentagon objective since at least before the collapse of the Soviet Union in nineteen ninety-one. And the 9-11 attack gave them the pretext to make this major grab for the oil and gas of Central Asia. And they are there today with their bases, with their troops, in the surrounding countries in Central Asia. And of course in the process, obliterated, we don't even have an estimate of the Muslims in Afghanistan who were killed in the air bombardment, twenty, twenty five thousand, maybe more, and tens of thousands of others starved to death and still suffering today.

But that, as we know from all the records was only the first step in the process. They wanted to finish the job in Iraq. And so immediately after September 11, Bush ordered Rumsfeld to update and operationalize the plans for attacking and invading Iraq. It had nothing at all to do with weapons of mass destruction. We in the peace movement in America had been saying that all along. The United Nations had determined there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. These were lies designed to scaremonger the American people and Congress into supporting an illegal war of aggression, a Nuremberg crime against peace, against Iraq. And they told whatever lies and broke what international laws they had to break in order to attack Iraq.

And today the estimate, again we don't know. Perhaps two hundred thousand people in Iraq had been killed outright by the United States, Britain, its allies, Australia in Iraq. And again, most of them civilians. Clearly if you add up what United States government has done to Iraq from August of 1990, when it imposed the genocidal economic embargo until today. The United States and Britain have inflicted outright genocide on the Muslim and Christian people of Iraq and they are predominately Muslim as we know.

Now comes the third step in the Pentagon's pre-existing plan, to control and dominate the oil and gas resources of the Persian Gulf and Central Asia. It's sounds a bit like the plan that Hitler and the Nazis had in the 1930”s. Does it not? First go into Austria, then go into Czechoslovakia, then go into Poland. So first Afghanistan, then Iraq, and now Iran. And so now Iran is going to be the next victim of these outright criminals unless you and I can stop them.

Right now there are three aircraft carrier task forces in the Persian Gulf. And whenever they had put three aircraft carrier task forces over there, it's always to prepare for an attack. And according to Seymour Hersch, the award winning journalist, it will probably be an aerial bombardment, along the lines of what they did to Yugoslavia in 1999. As you remember there, seventy-eight days of aerial bombardment by the United States and NATO with no authorization from the Security Council. Clearly illegal. Killing again, we don't know the exact number outright, four to five thousand innocent civilians. And targeting civilian infrastructure, all up and down, from which the people still suffer today. The use of depleted uranium ammunitions, outbreaks of cancer are documented today.

So this is what, is being planned right now as we speak; an attack upon Iran. Using jet fighter aircraft, fighter bombers, on these three aircraft carrier task forces, using cruise missiles on submarines and of course Israel will be involved and have a role to play, doing exactly what the Americans tell them to do. In addition, it appears that if they attack Iran, they will also attack Syria. Yesterday, if you heard President Bush's press conference in Vienna, he threatened Syria, right? There's no other word for it. He threatened Syria. These Neo-Conservatives want to take out Syria as a favor to Israel. Remember, many of these Neo-Conservatives are affiliated personally and professionally with the Likhud Party in Israel and Ariel Sharon, the butcher of Beirut, the man who exterminated twenty thousand Arabs in Lebanon, most of them, not all of them were Muslims. And in addition, slaughtered two thousand completely innocent Palestinian women, children and old men at Sabra and Shatila. Ariel Sharon, the man who went to Haram Al-Sharif, the third holiest site in Islam, where Muhammad, (Peace Be Upon Him) ascended into heaven, and desecrated the Haram on September 28th, 2000, and deliberately provoked the start of the Al-Aqsa Intifada and has inflicted death and destruction on the Palestinian people since then. Close to thirty seven hundred Palestinians since then alone have been killed….most of them shot down like dogs in the street, and what has the Muslim world done about this?

My Palestinian friends tell me that they are worried that the government of Malaysia might recognize Israel and establish diplomatic relations with Israel. I certainly hope this is not true. We must treat the criminal apartheid regime in Israel, the same way the world treated the criminal apartheid regime in South Africa. If the United States attacks Iran, they will probably attack Syria with the Israeli air force and they will attack Lebanon to take out the Islamic resistance movement in southern Lebanon - Hezbollah that defended the legitimate rights of Lebanon and the Lebanese people and expelled the invading longstanding occupying Israeli army that had the full support of the United States government for over twenty years.

So they could attack Iran, Syria, Southern Lebanon and inflict yet another round of ethnic cleansing on the suffering Palestinian people. Remember Sharon and Likhud believe that Jordan is Palestine. And they want to drive as many Palestinians as possible out of their homes and into Jordan.

So if the United States as reported by Hersh and other reliable sources, goes ahead and attack Iran, we could see warfare erupt all the way from Egypt to the border with India. This whole area convulsed in warfare. And who will be the primary victims of this war? Muslims. The United States could not care less about Muslim life. Look at the deionization and victimization of Muslims that we have seen inflicted by the United States and its surrogate, Israel. Look at Guantanamo, where six hundred Muslim men have been treated like dogs in a kennel. Pretty much the way the Nazis treated the Jews. Look at Abu Ghraib and the sadism and sexual exploitation and perversion of Muslims by their American captors. And the same thing has been done in Baghram in Afghanistan. And when Professor Sharif Bassiouni, the UN special rapporteur filed the report with the Security Council against US practices in Afghanistan, the Americans had Kofi Annan fire him. Just as they had Kofi Annan fire Mary Robinson, the UN high commissioner for human rights, when she protested what was going on down in Guantanamo.

So if the United States as reported by Hersh and other reliable sources, goes ahead and attack Iran, we could see warfare erupt all the way from Egypt to the border with India. This whole area convulsed in warfare. And who will be the primary victims of this war? Muslims. The United States could not care less about Muslim life. Look at the deionization and victimization of Muslims that we have seen inflicted by the United States and its surrogate, Israel. Look at Guantanamo, where six hundred Muslim men have been treated like dogs in a kennel. Pretty much the way the Nazis treated the Jews. Look at Abu Ghraib and the sadism and sexual exploitation and perversion of Muslims by their American captors. And the same thing has been done in Baghram in Afghanistan. And when Professor Sharif Bassiouni, the UN special rapporteur filed the report with the Security Council against US practices in Afghanistan, the Americans had Kofi Annan fire him. Just as they had Kofi Annan fire Mary Robinson, the UN high commissioner for human rights, when she protested what was going on down in Guantanamo.

Now, I do not believe the United States will initially start bombing Iran with nuclear weapons. But if things get out of control they are fully prepared to use tactical nuclear weapons. And here in our materials, you have the Pentagon’s Joint Publication 3-12, which you can get on the internet…. just do a Google search and read it. And you will see there dated fifteenth March 2005; nuclear, tactical nuclear weapons have been fully integrated into United States conventional forces. So if Iran were to defend itself, human wave attacks, whatever, they will be happy to use nuclear weapons, tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. Remember, these Neo-Nazis, Neo-Cons want to break the taboo of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They want to use tactical nuclear weapons, to be able to say to the rest of the world, you do what we tell you to do or else look what we did to the Iranians.

It's a very serious situation. And this could even get further out of control. Remember that before Bush invaded Iraq, President Putin of Russia said that if he invades Iraq he could set off World War Three. Well, I interpreted that as an implicit threat. Even the famous American news broadcaster Walter Cronkite said that if Bush invaded Iraq he could set off World War Three. Two weeks ago we had the meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization; China, Russia and Iran. So again, if Bush were to attack Iran, he very well could set off a Third World War, a nuclear war. And that is where you come in. Dr. Mahathir has had the vision to call for this conference to alert the entire world to the existential dangers presented by a US attack on Iran that could readily become nuclear, regional and global. And I am calling upon you to do whatever you can in cooperation with Dr. Mahathir and the Perdana Global Peace Foundation to head this off. Allah has given each and everyone of you skills that can be used in this endeavour. I can't tell you what they are, but you yourself know what they are. And you must go to Dr. Mahathir. You must go to the Perdana Peace Foundation and say, "This is what I can do. These are my talents. These are my professional qualifications. These are my skills. This is my cheque book. Let me help. Let me prevent, let me help prevent a nuclear war, a possible final, cataclysmic Third World War."

Thank you, shukran.

-Francis A. Boyle, Professor of Law, University of Illinois, is author of Foundations of World Order, Duke University Press, The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence, and Palestine, Palestinians and International Law, by Clarity Press. He can be reached at: FBOYLE@LAW.UIUC.EDU

The Palestinian Chronicle

'Dispute' or 'occupation?'

Opinion

July 6, 2006

Israel does not act by the standards it expects of the Palestinians, writes Maher Mughrabi.

IN ANY conversation with well-meaning bystanders about Israel and the Palestinians, the moment always comes when they ask why the two sides can't just learn to live as neighbours. The current escalation of hostilities in Gaza must seem to be pure bloody-mindedness if you believe — as these people seem to do — that the two sides live next door to each other.

Such a belief is probably what makes the so-called security barrier seem so logical. Israeli novelist Amos Oz has asked the world to help Israelis and Palestinians to "divorce". He seems to forget that the two sides have never been "married"; that there is no legally binding arrangement committing them to one another's welfare.

A recent letter to The Age took the familial metaphor a step further. Its author pointed to Hamas' refusal to give "direct" recognition to Israel and said it was time to choose: "One cannot be just a little bit pregnant."

If only politics were a science, like biology. Then we might be able to explain why it is that while Australia, Britain and the US all recognise Israel, they also have their embassies in Tel Aviv and not Jerusalem, because they do not recognise Israeli rule over part of its own "indivisible" capital.

Better yet, we might understand how it can be that Israel does not recognise the presence of its troops and settlers in the West Bank and Gaza Strip as an occupation, and why it was that when former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon used the O-word to describe what was happening in Gaza, he was forced to rephrase by his own attorney-general.

If Israel recognised that the West Bank and Gaza were occupied, rather than "disputed", two things would follow. First, the Geneva Convention would apply fully to those territories, making it illegal for settler families to move into them and for thousands of Palestinian men, women and children to be taken out to face indefinite "security detention" in Israeli jails. Second, instead of simply talking about a "viable Palestinian state", Israel would have formally acknowledged the existence of a separate entity west of the River Jordan.

There was a time when Arab governments pretended to themselves that Israel did not exist — its name was never mentioned in the media or official pronouncements. The rest of the world saw this as absurd. Yet in recent times, spokesmen for the Israeli Government have warned the European Union that funding to help the Palestinians should not give the democratically elected Hamas Government "recognition or legitimacy", while at the same time insisting that the Palestinian Authority must be held "responsible" for the capture of Israeli soldier Corporal Gilad Shalit. Which is it to be?

Israel's withdrawal from Gaza is another phantom pregnancy. That people still express surprise over such a unilateral move's failure to produce peace is baffling, given that even the bitterest divorce is not only negotiated but also subject to independent legal arbitration. As the blockade of Gaza and subsequent military incursion demonstrate, Israel may have abandoned the prerogative of settlement, but it retains that of collective punishment.

Hamas, meanwhile, has limited itself to de facto and not de jure recognition of Israel because it understands that the sovereignty which stands in need of recognition is not Israeli but Palestinian. Or, to put it another way, the question is not "is Israel?" but " where is Israel?"

Is Hebron in Israel or not? Is the town of Ariel, or the arable land of the Jordan Valley? If so, then what does "viable statehood" for Palestinians mean, and where is it expected to take place?

Until recently, former World Bank chief James Wolfensohn was the man the international community assigned to such questions. He had the decency to seem puzzled by Western powers who poured billions of dollars into building Palestinian institutions only to cut them off after a democratic election. "It would surprise me if one could win by … starving the Palestinians," he said in May, "and I don't think anyone in the Quartet believes that to be the policy."

Yet it was precisely the decision of the EU and the US to declare a Palestinian Authority governed by Hamas untouchable that gave Israel renewed financial and political power over the lives and deaths of Palestinians, culminating in the mass kidnapping of Hamas MPs and ministers.

The Gaza power plant destroyed by Israel was insured by an arm of the US Government, and there has been plenty of media speculation as to whether (and, given its sanctions against the Palestinian Authority, how) it will pay out.

But the greater question is when will the US and its allies feel the need to provide some sort of cover for the basic human rights of Palestinians and their own investment in Palestinian governance.

Over the years, many people have agonised over one-state and two-state solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But if Palestinian self-determination is ever to become a reality, and Palestinian and Israeli calls for justice in the face of terrorism are to be tackled in a non-partisan way, then everyone involved in this conflict must have access to a common standard of rights.

It is time for the world to commit itself to a one- status solution. Continued

Maher Mughrabi is a staff writer.

A Complete Disgrace

Editorial

by Housewife4Palestine


To begin with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is a poor example to even open her mouth, she has proved time again she let’s her rear over run her head when it come especially to foreign policy and the statement she made of it being “high time,” for Hamas to release the captured Israeli Solider just show’s her lack of thinking on the whole scope of the situation or better yet her siding with Israel against the saving of Palestinian women and children suffering in Israeli prison’s. She also did not take into account the invasion in Gaza, which has contributed too much destruction and lost of innocent lives.

Then you have the world press corps seemly keeping it a secret of exactly how many civilians are actually dying in this extreme situation that is being faced by the Palestinian people. If you notice, they are great about covering what the poor Israeli’s are up to; but forget the real victims in this case which are the Palestinian people living in Gaza and the West Bank that are being attacked with ground troops and overhead missiles just to name examples.

The press like to make a big deal that two rocket’s made it to the Israeli side and oh yes no one was hurt. But we all know this can not be said for the people in Gaza. Nor, the whole that has been to prominent in the global news that the Israeli’s are not just in Gaza, but terrorize the people of the West Bank too.

Then we get to the Hamas government, United States and Israel wishing to deem them the extreme terrorist because they formed a resistance to fight oppression of their people; to even the point of actually wishing their country back. Most people if they are robbed of home, life and limb will fight. Any country that is invaded or occupied by a foreign government will do their best to elevate that foreign power from their soil Palestine, Iraq Afghanistan; just to name a few all are trying to do just that. But yet they are being deemed terrorist, militant’s, insurgent’s for doing the very thing most people would do when there is such a threat to their home or family.

Look to the steps the United States is taking with all the illegal wire taping and so forth to make the American public believe they are in so much danger, which tends to make many American’s now believe the threat is on the inside not from a wolf knocking at their door. The wolf is already in the hen house so to speak.

As for Mr. bush indorsing Olmert to attack Gaza and go against the Geneva Convention just shows where his head is and from what I have seen since he has been in office is not the good of the nation or the world but how much butter he can get on his bread before he leaves office or get’s the boot.

The remark of Israel going into Gaza for the sake of one 19 year old, I do have to agree is naïve because what information I have scratched out this plan was on the table already, they just had to have an excuse. Well all of a sudden one day a 19 year old Israeli kid was grabed and with that and excuse. Kind of reminds of the reason for the invasion of Iraq, as I shake my head in disgust.

The Arab nations instead of fighting amongst them selves on this issue should get together with enough inceptions to bring a real halt to this problem once and for all. Their may be a few sore feeling’s but the hole world would certainly be better off. Where is their bread buttered?


As for those in the West that wish to take control of resources and to dominate the world, it is just a reminder that the Napoleons in this life tend to end up lonely on an Island; completely in disgrace.

One last thing, does the world day after day like to sit back and watch mass murder on their television, in their newspaper’s, on their radio and do nothing?


Or is it easier to bury your head like and Ostrich and hope for it to go away while similar crimes is being done to you, your family as you sit back relaxing reading this editorial?

Will Israel Work with Hamas Towards and End to the Gaza Invasion?

Hamas ready to compromise if Israel swaps prisoners

July 5, 2006

By Khaled Yacoub Oweis

DAMASCUS (Reuters) -Syria and Hamas have told mediators that the Islamic movement will show flexibility in a confrontation over a captured Israeli soldier if Israel accepts a prisoner swap, political sources said on Wednesday.

Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal also said at a meeting with a visiting Turkish official that Hamas was ready to resist an all-out Israeli attack on the Gaza strip but preferred a deal to end the crisis, the sources told Reuters.

"Meshaal said any solution must be based on a prisoner exchange. He did not say whether that exchange had to be simultaneous but indicated Hamas was flexible," a Palestinian politicians familiar with the meeting told Reuters.

Israel has already rejected any negotiations or prisoner swap.

Meshaal has not appeared in public since crisis began when the soldier was kidnapped on June 25 and this was the first indication he was still in Syria.

Ahmet Davudoglu, a senior adviser to the Turkish prime minister, met on Tuesday with President Bashar al-Assad and with Meshaal, who lives in Damascus along with several other high-level Hamas members.

Israel has threatened to kill Meshaal unless the soldier was freed. Israeli planes flew over a Syrian presidential palace last week in a warning to Assad to stop supporting Hamas.

Assad received a call from Saudi King Abdullah on Wednesday about the crisis, state media said.

The 40-year-old president, shaped by his late father's lifetime struggle with Israel, has resisted pressure from Arab rulers allied with the United States to pressure Hamas.


Syrian officials say Arab countries, such as Egypt, want Syria to lean on Hamas to help release the soldier without Israel freeing some of 10,000 Palestinian prisoners it holds.

Israel has turned down a deal that could initially involve releasing around 400 Palestinian women and youths from Israeli prisons in return for information about the soldier.

U.S. Secretary of State of Condoleezza Rice, who met with Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul on Wednesday, said it was "high time" for Hamas to release the soldier, who was captured in an operation involving Hamas' military wing on June 25.

A member in the ruling Baath Party said Washington and its Arab allies did not understand that Syria will not sell out Hamas, although Damascus's insistence on a swap is causing tension with Arab countries.

"It is naive to think Israel is destroying Gaza for the sake of its soldier. Syria is adamant that these attacks must stop. Only then we can talk about pressure on Hamas," he said.

"Hamas's exiled leadership is in close contact with Syria throughout this crisis. The stakes are high and Syria does not host Hamas for nothing."

Israel vowed on Wednesday to expand attacks on Gaza in response to a missile strike by Hamas on an Israeli city in which no one was hurt. Hamas said the strike was in revenge to the Israeli offensive on Gaza, which included civilian targets.

Osama helping Bush?

Media Release

July 4, 2006

Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden had virtually ‘helped’ US President George W Bush in winning his second consecutive presidential election in 2004, by issuing a recorded video four days ahead of the polling criticising Bush’s policies.

The video spread a message among the Americans that Osama’s denunciation (of Bush’s policies) “endorsed John Kerry’s candidature”, conclude CIA analysts, according to a new book “The One Percent Doctrine”, excerpts of which were posted on the website ‘consortiumnews.com’. “Bush’s supporters quickly called Osama’s denunciation as his “endorsement of John Kerry, but behind the walls, the CIA analysts concluded the opposite i.e. bin Laden was trying to help Bush gain a second term,” the report in the website quoted a passage in the book written by Ron Suskind as saying.